@Wabbit2313 said:
How about a "Ban the Member" button. After a certain number of clicks by different members, he/she is canned right then and there!
No that wouldn't be fair. It would likely take out some members that do meaningfully contribute based on someone with a spiteful streak.
It was a joke, but limit the voting to those who have 5 stars, and if enough 5 star generals vote them down, they are canned! This way, people with ALT's can't be spiteful!
Case in point regarding drive-by "disagrees": @jerseycat101 hit me with two disagrees ( and @Ricko with one) but has not even posted on this thread. That adds nothing at all to the dialogue.
@JBK said:
I'd like to see the disagree button removed. Anyone who disagrees should post their reasons why.
Why do "disagrees" have to be explained but not "agrees"?
"Agree" means you concur with what someone said. No further comment necessary.
"Disagree" means you have a different opinion or perspective, and unless you elaborate we will never know what it is.
Not necessarily. When you posted that you would like to see the disagree button removed, and someone disagrees, it likely means that person is fond of the disagree button and wants it kept around.
@JBK said:
All true, but they rate us with stars (just like kids in school) and those strikes take points off your total. I will say that once you get to 5 stars it is less of a concern. It is easy to get hung up on it but as you say, who really cares (or who should care).
For sure, a lot of people just want to be loved.
If only they handed out (CAC) stickers like they do in elementary school, we could all be happy.
In my elementary school they handed out little buttons with the school name on it. The principal would show up at lunch, recess, in class, wherever, to present one to an "outstanding" or helpful (teacher's pet) student who was nominated by a teacher. This went on for a few weeks and I tried to do whatever I could to earn one. Finally at lunch one day I was presented with my prize.
Then a couple days later they gave them out to everyone.
@jersaycat101 hit me with a disagree for this post?? Clearly a troll who is abusing the forum. Reported to Moderator.
Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set: 1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S. Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
Comments
How about a "Ban the Member" button. After a certain number of clicks by different members, he/she is canned right then and there!
There should be a hug button.
How about a shame button.
“Forward this post to another TPG and let them worry about it”
No that wouldn't be fair. It would likely take out some members that do meaningfully contribute based on someone with a spiteful streak.
It was a joke, but limit the voting to those who have 5 stars, and if enough 5 star generals vote them down, they are canned! This way, people with ALT's can't be spiteful!
When grades are posted, this would be a hit!
Case in point regarding drive-by "disagrees": @jerseycat101 hit me with two disagrees ( and @Ricko with one) but has not even posted on this thread. That adds nothing at all to the dialogue.
Not necessarily. When you posted that you would like to see the disagree button removed, and someone disagrees, it likely means that person is fond of the disagree button and wants it kept around.
"No Maas". For those occasional inane posts.
Belly ?
@jersaycat101 hit me with a disagree for this post?? Clearly a troll who is abusing the forum. Reported to Moderator.
1: GET IT GRADED
2: I forgot what I was going to say
3: Your serious?
if you have no clue what an OP is trying to discuss, how about a "HUH?", button?
This button for stalkers
...
If we were all the same, the world would be an incredibly boring place.
Tommy
Maybe a "WOW" button . . .
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!