Home U.S. Coin Forum

Should I send my modern medals to NGC VS PCGS to save grading cost? Pros & Cons?

ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited April 4, 2018 11:49AM in U.S. Coin Forum

I am contemplating whether to send them to NGC for grading due to the cost ($20 vs $32)?
Would their standard be the same as PCGS? I am well aware the PCGS graded coins command higher price in a secondary market. Please let me know what you think. Thank you.

Comments

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I collect for pleasure and not for profit FYI

  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,627 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My sister said to me : “never should on yourself”. It was good advice, forty some years ago. Take my advice. :smiley:

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TwoSides2aCoin said:
    My sister said to me : “never should on yourself”. It was good advice, forty some years ago. Take my advice. :smiley:

    What is the real meaning if I may ask?

  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,627 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 4, 2018 12:02PM

    I meant to add , “ask your sister.” (Jokingly) No seriously. I am sure cost effectiveness plays a vital role in our (collectively speaking) decision to use any of a number of other places and services . ANACS is .... Another option.

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,343 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you really want to save on grading costs, you could consider leaving them as is or self-slab in either Coin World or Lighthouse slabs. How big are these medals?

  • bobsrbobsr Posts: 392 ✭✭✭✭

    At least 5 times in my life I have held a coin or series of coins in my hand that I vowed to keep until I die. I am a collector , not an investor. I collect for the joy of holding something in my hand that was a part of history that belongs to me. I have in my " Box of Twenty" both PCGS and NGC holdered coins. In my opinion, all of them are undergraded (Grin). It is common and public knowledge that for the most part, PCGS commands a higher price for the same coin. If its not too much of a monetary strain go for the gold. Better to spend it up front than to try and cross in later life and spend double. By the way, I only have 1 of those 5 coins in my possession now.
    Bob Sr CEO Fieldtechs

  • jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,241 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have a gold medal at NGC right now. I did not know if ngc or pcgs would grade it, so I sent emails and pictures to both asking. NGC responded, PCGS did not... so NGC got my business this time, lol.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,714 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Define "modern medals". Some/many may not be worth slabbing at all. Will the market care?

    All glory is fleeting.
  • cardinalcardinal Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The price of grading is certainly one consideration. I have been sending medals and tokens to PCGS, as the PCGS slab is visibly clearer. When I look at an NGC slab, I can actually see the grain of the plastic interfering with getting a clear view of the medal, and it's worse under magnification.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,907 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Interesting question. NGC has a coin discussion web site. Suggest that you ask this same question over there to get a different perspective. Let us know what you decide.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • MedalCollectorMedalCollector Posts: 2,023 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Of the few submissions I have had with PCGS (about 20 medals total), they have never accurately attributed all of the medals in the submission. Additionally, some medals with edge lettering have been put into holders that did not show it, and others with a plain edge have been put in holders with the edge visible. Some medals of the same size were put into different-sized holders. And, many of the large-sized holders I've received have come scuffed up and scratched.

    I've only sent 2 medals to NGC, but both were accurately described and slabbed appropriately.

    Still, I prefer the PCGS slab and will, in most cases, continue to submit to them.

  • Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PCGS !!! :)

    Timbuk3
  • MedalCollectorMedalCollector Posts: 2,023 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If they're modern, why not the submit under the modern or economy tier?

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 4, 2018 5:25PM

    @messydesk said:
    If you really want to save on grading costs, you could consider leaving them as is or self-slab in either Coin World or Lighthouse slabs. How big are these medals?

    I have 5 of these common and currently available american liberty 1.598 inches / 40.60 mm

    This is a smaller pewter medal of Saint Gaudens

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @291fifth said:
    Define "modern medals". Some/many may not be worth slabbing at all. Will the market care?

    This?

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just a thought --- consider why you want to have your medals put into plastic holders and graded? Does this improve your enjoyment or something else....?

    You can buy several very nice, artistic medals for what it would cost to ship, authenticate and grade the ones you have.

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RogerB said:

    Just a thought --- consider why you want to have your medals put into plastic holders and graded? Does this improve your enjoyment or something else....?
    You can buy several very nice, artistic medals for what it would cost to ship, authenticate and grade the ones you have.

    I have mixed feeling about leaving the medals raw and continue handling them mainly for my pleasure. I thought the cardinal rule is to preserve our coins and Not to handle them as fun objects but who should care...right? I agree with you as well as @bobsr
    I will send the Saint medal to NGC since I've seen a similar one in their holder and leave the silver medals in their own capsules. Thanks

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 36,091 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Moderns - if you are outside first strike leave them raw

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,714 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The St. Gaudens medal should be marked as silver on the edge. The antiqued finish may look like pewter but it was just part of the manufacturing process. I don't think they made any in pewter.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @291fifth said:
    The St. Gaudens medal should be marked as silver on the edge. The antiqued finish may look like pewter but it was just part of the manufacturing process. I don't think they made any in pewter.

    Yes it is stamped .999 silver on the edge

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 4, 2018 6:30PM

    @291fifth said:
    The St. Gaudens medal should be marked as silver on the edge. The antiqued finish may look like pewter but it was just part of the manufacturing process. I don't think they made any in pewter.

    Yes it is stamped .999 silver on the edge :)

  • cardinalcardinal Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Paradisefound said:

    @RogerB said:

    Just a thought --- consider why you want to have your medals put into plastic holders and graded? Does this improve your enjoyment or something else....?
    You can buy several very nice, artistic medals for what it would cost to ship, authenticate and grade the ones you have.

    I have mixed feeling about leaving the medals raw and continue handling them mainly for my pleasure. I thought the cardinal rule is to preserve our coins and Not to handle them as fun objects but who should care...right? I agree with you as well as @bobsr
    I will send the Saint medal to NGC since I've seen a similar one in their holder and leave the silver medals in their own capsules. Thanks

    I was invited to write an article for the journal of the Medal Collectors of America specifically on the topic of whether medals should be encapsulated or kept raw. My thought is that we are temporary custodians of these pieces of history, and so we should keep them in the best condition possible, and I elaborated on that in my article. In the following issue of the journal there was a lot of feedback from other members, essentially saying I was misguided, and simply didn't possess the ability to handle medals "properly." Those members said that medals were intended to be held and touched -- in the raw -- and that they are manufactured such that handling would not damage them in any way.

    Here is such a medal, never encapsulated and certainly lovingly examined throughout its life. Did handling change its appearance over the years?

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 4, 2018 8:13PM

    @cardinal
    YES and I found this picture of a more pristine coin presumably a BU?
    I see and understand what you're trying to cove; I see the result of not preserving such medals and it is terrible indeed.
    I only spoke of mine and mine alone for not being care to a degree because the stage of pleasure they're giving me as a collector. Thank you for posting a one of a kind beauty.......

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 4, 2018 8:26PM

    Don't forget PCGS also has TrueView which I consider a very valuable service.

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @cardinal

    It is one of my favorite reverse Minerva fending off the British lion and baby Hercules strangling two snakes.
    I've learnt so much history by coin collecting and read the story behind each and everyone on them <3

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    a celebration of British surrenders of Saratoga (1777) and Yorktown (1781)

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,691 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just because you have a medal, does not mean PCGS will grade it. It has to be listed in one of these

    https://pcgs.com/tokensandmedals

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file