Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Spark erosion counterfeit or just corrosion? 1871 IHC

nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
My bet is on spark erosion counterfeit. Any other guesses? Link

Comments

  • Options
    Looks like just corrosion. like this baby link to coin
    image
  • Options
    GaCoinGuyGaCoinGuy Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭✭
    I'm no expert, but a few things bother me about that coin..............


    #1---The obverse is very rough, pitted looking, yet the date is crystal clear.
    #2---The last 1 looks odd compared to the first 1. And the 7 looks like it's sitting on top of something, almost like a repunched date or something.
    #3---On the reverse, the coin is worn pretty smooth around the wreath and the shield, yet "One Cent" seems to be very sharply struck.

    I hope I'm wrong, but that coin almost look fake to me.
    imageimage

  • Options
    goose3goose3 Posts: 11,471 ✭✭✭
    looks fake to me too.

    lettering on reverse looks very suspicious as does the date, as pointed out above.
  • Options
    Either way... it's still not "attractive".
    "Don't talk like an ignarosis."

    I specialize in Wisconsin currency! Looking for information on WI national banknotes. Census stands at 12,318 notes.

    **"Wisconsin National Bank Notes - 2nd Edition" is out!!!" Only $20PPd!!!
  • Options
    Spark erosion counterfeit -this is a process of using an electrical spark across a small gap to transfer a design from a genuine coin to a steel die. After the die is polished, the fake coins struck from the die will show a granular appearance with some loss of detail on the coin's relief, which was incuse on the die. These counterfeits, most often seen of "keys" such as the 1909-S-VDB and 1955 double die Lincoln Cents, can be very deceptive. Detection can sometimes be made based on fine details, such as die polish lines, that are known to be present on the original die(s) but did not transfer to the spark erosion die. the date looks bold but it would look warn if it were a counterfeit to.
    image
  • Options
    nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    Could it have been a tooled date? I've seen some examples of spark erosion that looked like this. Some are probably good, but many are quite pebbly in the examples I saw.
  • Options
    coppercoinscoppercoins Posts: 6,084 ✭✭✭
    I'm with the bet on spark erosion. Too many things just don't look "right".
    C. D. Daughtrey, NLG
    The Lincoln cent store:
    http://www.lincolncent.com

    My numismatic art work:
    http://www.cdaughtrey.com
    USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
    image
  • Options
    LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,705 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Reminds me of a hospital visit...

    "You look surprisingly well considering the condition your in".....agree it looks "unreal".
    Gone but not forgotten: IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal, CoinsAreFun.
  • Options
    GaCoinGuyGaCoinGuy Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for the explanation of the spark erosion counterfeiting....I've never heard of that.
    imageimage

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file