Options
Do you generally pay more for older series 90% silver?
Dave99B
Posts: 8,959 ✭✭✭✭✭
Just wondering what type of a premium do you generally pay (if at all) for older series 90% silver.
Any rule of thumb? 5% more? 10% more? Or in your mind is it all about the same....90% is 90%, and you assign no premium.
When I say 'older', I'm talking Barber coinage, Franklin/Walkers halves, etc. 90% silver.....vs the usual Mercury/Roosy/Washingon 90% mix.
Thanks,
Dave
Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
0
Comments
In our area you would pay more for Barber coinage certainly unless they are just slicks. Otherwise no
You really have to watch getting charged a premium for older series if you are losing a lot silver content because the older series are much more worn. Generally, if I just want bulk silver halves, for example, I want all '64 Kennedys. On the other hand, I have a whole Dansco circulated Franklin set (and a Walker short set) that is 95% derived from junk silver I purchased near melt.
By in large, it all has been picked over so many times, the "older" ones are just worn common stuff with no premium, except for the GEE WHIZ this coin is 100+ years old.
If silver goes back to $50 an ounce, ALL the stuff in the bag, from slicked out seated liberty to crisp quasi BU 1964-D Roosevelts will hit the smelter. At that point, the "worn thin as a dime" coins will be valued less, as the silver content has been diminished.
If you want GEE WHIZ examples, dating back to the bust coins, for a SLIGHT premium, you can buy a few individually out of dealers "dead" inventory, maybe a scratch or flaw, but still up to a 170 year old coin.
Most of the common date and slick 90% silver has already hit the smelter over the last 50 years. How much is actually left, compared to the original mintage?
The 1979-80 silver price run-up resulted in a lot of Barber coins in Fair through Good condition being melted. These used to be much more common than what is seen today.
So far as paying a premium for this type of material ... don't.
Seller's try to get premiums, but I would never pay for them. Barbers are always slick (thus not even worth it for the bullion) and Walking liberty and Mercs are infinitely too common to merit any sort of premium as bullion.
To me it is nothing but bullion. No premium above what bullion brings.
Barbers are the Rodney Dangerfield of classic coinage. There was a promotion a few years back where the US Mint used various dealers to sell one of their products. The dealer in Massachusetts added $6 in "melt value Barber Halves" to bring the value above where they wouldn't have to charge sales tax. Among my 12 coins were a 1904-S and 1908-S in solid original VG. Sure beats a 1964 Kennedy.
When I was working for Harlan Berk in Chicago, if I was not too busy and was breaking down collections or culling silver on the coin counter, I would toss VG and better Mercs and Walkers into bins. These would eventually get put up into $50 or $100 ziploc bags that I could occasionally sell for a small premium.
However, if we ever needed a $500 or $1,000 bag for a retail customer and we needed face value to complete the bag, in they went. And when things went crazy in 2008 the premiums for slightly better bullion disappeared and everything went into the bags except culls.
I would pay more for Barbers, and sometimes you get a better date
BHNC #203