Took a chance

Options
Walkerfan
Walkerfan Posts: 10,392 ✭✭✭✭✭
I found this one on the 'Bay, which is either loved or hated by many. But eBay has always been very relevant for me, even today, although it is accused of being a dumping ground. I don't believe this.



When I first saw this coin; I was in awe of the strike, as many 1938 P coins are 'mushy'. This one looks sharp and relatively clean to my eyes.



I see distinct luster bands but the coin appeared 'milky' to me, which can be a sign of altered surfaces. But then I looked at all of the other coins from this seller and they all had that same look, so I feel it is a by-product of his photography style.



The bands tell me it is quite lustrous, so I took a chance....price was fair, too.



image



image

Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

Comments

  • SamByrd
    SamByrd Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭✭
    Options
    this coin is a good example of full strike , tough to find in this series.

    The eagles breast feathers and Liberty's head the hand and cape detail its all there.

    It has the detail many proofs have of the era.

    I bet it pops in hand sure looks like a blazer from the rather poor sellers images.
  • thebeav
    thebeav Posts: 4,117 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    It does look quite nice.
    Hope so !
  • roadrunner
    roadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Looks like it is already in a TPG holder. Looks 64/65 to me. Luster looks fine. Nice looking coin with an impeccable strike.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • kaz
    kaz Posts: 9,378 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Beautiful coin, looks like booming luster.
  • Wabbit2313
    Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Strike is great. Price was right. I already saw this one. I bought some of his other Walkers recently.
  • ricko
    ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Nice pick up.... I think you will like that once in hand.... Post a follow up when you get it. Cheers, RickO
  • johnny9434
    johnny9434 Posts: 34,072 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    that one looks pretty good. i hope it pans out when you get it image
  • Walkerfan
    Walkerfan Posts: 10,392 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Thanks, guys---it is a PCGS 66.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • shorecoll
    shorecoll Posts: 5,447 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    It is a dumping ground, but it's not a dumping ground for everybody. You just need the eye to see through the "stuff", looks like you do.
    ANA-LM, NBS, EAC
  • JBN
    JBN Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Pictures are a bit fuzzy, so I cannot judge the right field or Liberty's hip.

    The strike is great.

    Nice job and congratulations.
  • Walkerfan
    Walkerfan Posts: 10,392 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Originally posted by: JBN

    Pictures are a bit fuzzy, so I cannot judge the right field or Liberty's hip.



    The strike is great.



    Nice job and congratulations.




    Thanks, JBN.



    Yep, that was part of the gamble.



    I am guessing that the center (left leg) skirt lines are full and there's not any abrasions on the hip.



    As for the right field, it looks to me that there are some light, wispy abrasions but nothing deep or significant, which would be consistent for the grade.



    Sun looks real smooth, too.



    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • Raybo
    Raybo Posts: 5,362 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Great strike!

    I'm just wondering about that "mark" at about 1:30 on the obverse.
  • Walkerfan
    Walkerfan Posts: 10,392 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Originally posted by: Raybo

    Great strike!

    I'm just wondering about that "mark" at about 1:30 on the obverse.




    Almost all coins have tiny imperfections. I appreciate you pointing it out but that is almost invisible and not distracting in the least.



    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • breakdown
    breakdown Posts: 2,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    That is a good strike for that issue, reverse breast feathers look excellent. When you get it in hand (if you haven't already), check for the carbon spot Raybo points out. Sometimes these are distracting, sometimes they aren't -- all depends on what it looks like in-hand. Those abrasions in the right obverse field look minimal to me. With a PC 66, my guess is you will be pleased. Always like that you share your finds. And you can find good coins and bad coins in many places, including EBay.

    "Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.

  • mannie gray
    mannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Looks nice to me.

    I've thought for many years (even before PCGS/NGC/ANACS) that this date was very underrated.

    When I was a serious Walker collector, I searched long and hard for a nice one.

    Seems like the luster on the majority of these was usually "thin" and kind of washed-out looking.

    If that wasn't the case, on a few the luster was thick, creamy, frosty and "dreamy", but the coin was marked up to hell.

    Your coin looks to have the rare combo of thick nice luster and few contact marks.

    WELL DONE, I say!
  • DollarAfterDollar
    DollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,217 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    I think you'll like what you see when it get's to you. Luster and strike look top notch.





    Congrats!!
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file