Harry Laibstain. Computer room, STAT
topstuf
Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
Whoever changed your website did a really bad job,
Now the view inventory is covered by a testimonial.
Now the view inventory is covered by a testimonial.
0
Comments
Will try again.
Nope. Still doing it. Both on Chrome and IE without Chrome.
Maybe being west of the Rockies is my prob.
Not like the old format of LOTS of coins on the page.
Finally got through on my Android tablet.
I have used three different devices, two ISPs, and two different browsers (home and at work) in the past eight hours and have had different problems with all three.
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
I actually think this is quite an improvement. The site certainly is more visually appealing.
works for me on IE10
Sheeze.... HERE it only shows ONE row of coins and the rest ot the page is a testimonial and the site header.
Not like the old format of LOTS of coins on the page.
Are you on an actual computer, or one of those damned tablet things?
Tablets don't play nice with many webpages.
Just a WAG.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins]
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Coin Rarities Online
Everything looks fine, and it's a nicely designed site - much better than what he had before.
Proof Buffalo Registry Set
Capped Bust Quarters Registry Set
Proof Walking Liberty Halves Registry Set
Works well for me too.
I actually think this is quite an improvement. The site certainly is more visually appealing.
When diagnosing problems with responsive design, one trick is that the display isn't usually tied to the device but rather the window size. That means that if you view the site on a large desktop monitor, you can also check what it would look like on a smartphone simply by resizing the browser window to be very narrow.
In this case, the site has been designed so that there are always 4 columns of coins in the inventory, and the images get smaller as the window gets narrower.
The testimonial at the bottom of the screen is removed for very narrow windows, but not for windows above a certain width. Some of the testimonials are quite long -- I'm looking at a 5-line testimonial right now.
Also, while the header at the top of the screen is only one line high in wide windows, and it reduces to a single drop-down menu for very narrow windows, there is an intermediate size where it actually wraps to three (!) lines, and fairly tall lines to boot. That eats up even more real estate.
The bottom line is that there are some window sizes where the header at the top of the screen wraps to three lines, and the testimonial is still present and taking up lots of space on the bottom of the screen. When that happens, the OP is correct -- you can see fewer than 2 lines worth of inventory. By eye, I think that the worst experience would be on a smallish laptop: a short viewing window, and not terribly wide.
I've seen plenty of web sites that were far worse. This isn't a bad first attempt for an inhouse designer. On the other hand, if HLRC paid an external firm that claimed to know what they were doing in terms of web design, I think they'd be in line for a significant rebate. In my opinion, of course.
(FWIW, I figured out most of these issues when I converted http://www.so-calleddollars.com to use responsive web design myself, a few months ago.)