question on reholdering coins (prior labels)

jdimmick · November 3, 2015 12:08PM

Let say, you had a dozen really nice coins that were all previously holdered but removed from PCGS holders so they could be enjoyed raw. If you wanted to re-submit them back to PCGS , would you stick in the old label in each flip letting PCGS know that the coin had been holdered prior and what grade.

Now I know each coin has to be accessed at present regardless of what it was in before:

some other questions to ponder:

if a coin or two were NGC would you include those labels as well?

additionally: some had cac stickers which no longer matters because cac wont reholder unless you had visual proof it was prior.?

lastly, if you included labels, would you include them on a coin that is clearly undergraded in todays standards?

ps: don't slam me , it wasn't me who took them out , it was a customer of mine

Your thoughts appreciated as I am submitting them in Baltimore later this week

LindeDad · November 3, 2015 12:15PM

They will be treated as raw no matter what you send in, they could of been mishandled or worse as far the grading firm has to think.

MidLifeCrisis · November 3, 2015 12:15PM

Submit them with the labels and write an explanation on the submission form. Can't hurt.

lordmarcovan · November 3, 2015 12:20PM

Though I doubt it would guarantee their reholdering at the same grade, I suppose you could send some of the original PCGS inserts along, both in hopes of encouraging similar grades (though I don't know if the graders would see them), and to let PCGS correct the pop reports.

I'd hold back the labels on any you thought might be undergraded, though, and of course the NGC labels and CAC stickers would be entirely irrelevant and pointless to send.

keyman64 · November 3, 2015 12:25PM

That best thing the labels can do would be to have those coins removed from the pop reports.

The coins will be graded raw no regards for the labels.

BAJJERFAN · November 3, 2015 12:32PM

YEP!

Once a coin is cracked out ALL BETS ARE OFF per HRH.

Barndog · November 3, 2015 12:40PM

I would not include the labels. The coins don't need unnecessary scrutiny

MFH · November 3, 2015 2:10PM

I keep the old inserts and occasionally attach them to the back of the new slabs.

Especially when I do a cross over - it's my way of doing a comparison

between TPG's.

Zoins · November 3, 2015 2:14PM

Originally posted by: keyman64
That best thing the labels can do would be to have those coins removed from the pop reports.
The coins will be graded raw no regards for the labels.

The old labels won't help the grade but they will help the pops.

jdimmick · November 3, 2015 8:52PM

Thanks guys. I knew that it really had no bearing Ill leave them all out and hopefully catch an upgrade (or down grade). Ill keep the labels here, until they get graded and then compare. Then Ill send the lables in and have them adjust the pops

lkeigwin · November 3, 2015 11:03PM

Originally posted by: MFH

I keep the old inserts and occasionally attach them to the back of the new slabs. Especially when I do a cross over - it's my way of doing a comparison between TPG's.

I do this too. As a routine. It's another piece of the coin's history and worth saving, IMO.

Lance.

question on reholdering coins (prior labels)

Comments

Leave a Comment