New discovery on J-182: 1856 Flying Eagle cent in bronze.

The first and only example to actually test out as bronze has been found. This is believed to be unique. There are other examples attributed as J-182 by PCGS, but they have all tested out as copper (tags were not submitted to remove their listing.) It was thought that the J-182 should be delisted as not existing because of these previous changed attributions. No longer.
Link to CoinFacts
Link to CoinFacts

Rick Snow, Eagle Eye Rare Coins, Inc.Check out my new web site:
0
Comments
I was a Monkey
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
That's close enough to a normal bronze cent that it makes me think 1864 or later, but that's pure speculation.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Time to rev up the book!!!!
<< <i>Congrats on the find!!!
Time to rev up the book!!!! >>
All future copies purchased will have a hand written addendum!
OINK
What is important is that the J-182 is now known to exist, since this is the first and only example that has tested to be bronze not copper.
I bought the other J-182 PR62 a few years back and had it tested and sadly, it was misattributed. It reholdered to J-181. It is impossible to state that something does not exist, but with all previous J-182's being tested and becoming J-181, you have to, at some point, state that there are no legitimate J-182 bronze examples that are thought to exist. Then you find one and it changes the number known from 0 to 1. That's important.
And a beutiful and colorful coin
Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
<< <i> Then you find one and it changes the number known from 0 to 1. That's important. >>
you have explained this quite effectively imo
.