Options
Trying another raw CBH attribution. 1832, O-114 R4? Grade opinions?
sparky64
Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
What do you think?
If I'm correct PCGS has these as R4+.
There is a very small lump at the throat crease that doesn't show on the smallish pic.
The A in America is higher than the M too.
How about grade? VF25?
If I'm correct PCGS has these as R4+.
There is a very small lump at the throat crease that doesn't show on the smallish pic.
The A in America is higher than the M too.
How about grade? VF25?
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress
0
Comments
as that's one sweet looking cbh there
surely an old light cleaning that's more then market acceptable
like a "cir-cam" lite there
with wild flow in the obverse field
please update this when grades roll in
are you to add truview too as she's a glamour shot worthy example?
I couldn't justify getting the coin certified, as I don't think the variety is worth any considerable premium, but then again it's not my coin so the decision is entirely up to you.
Thanks for the compliments and grade opinion. I doubt it'll ever get submitted, however.
BustHalfBrian -
Thanks for the confirmation and opinions. Appreciated.
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress
1832 o-114
The missing detail is strike related more than wear. Your coin looks to be a VF 35 without luster, but a 40 or 45 if some good luster remains. My coin is in a 45 holder (decent luster)
BHNC member # 184!
http://www.busthalfaddict.com
No luster to speak of. I can see it as a 35. I like your example, btw.
I want to compliment you and thank you for your site. I've been enjoying it.
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress
I see it as a 35 also.
<< <i>Dave-
No luster to speak of. I can see it as a 35. I like your example, btw.
I want to compliment you and thank you for your site. I've been enjoying it. >>
Thanks and I am also not convinced of an R4 rating on this. Time will tell as interest grows demand will decide if this marriage is as scarce as thought currently. You seem to have a decent example that you should hold on to
BHNC member # 184!
http://www.busthalfaddict.com
Bust Half & FSB Merc Collector
I didn't check the attribution, but trust the other poster
BHNC #203
U.S. Type Set
<< <i>Thanks and I am also not convinced of an R4 rating on this. >>
This may not get answered buried here but I was wondering if the R scale ever changes?
Has anyone ever seen a change and if so, who does it.
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress
<< <i>
<< <i>Thanks and I am also not convinced of an R4 rating on this. >>
This may not get answered buried here but I was wondering if the R scale ever changes?
Has anyone ever seen a change and if so, who does it. >>
I believe some rarity ratings were adjusted in the latest edition of Overton/Parsley.
I think AMBPR has the most accurate rarity ratings. I use that for reference most often.