Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

1971 Topps High number: Guess the grade...

tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Guess the grade...

image
image
opcbaseball.com

Comments

  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,819 ✭✭✭✭✭
    NM 7 or NM+ 7.5


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • jordangretzkyfanjordangretzkyfan Posts: 2,513 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Print marks, edge wear and corners put it at PSA 6 in my opinion.
  • saucywombatsaucywombat Posts: 1,223 ✭✭✭
    7?
    Always looking for 1993-1999 Baseball Finest Refractors and1994 Football Finest Refractors.
    saucywombat@hotmail.com
  • itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭
    8(ST)
  • PSASAPPSASAP Posts: 2,284 ✭✭✭
    Looks like the card spent time in a photo album. I'd say 7 mk
  • jmaciujmaciu Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭
    I will say PSA 6.

    Jmaciu's Collection
  • ThoseBackPagesThoseBackPages Posts: 4,871 ✭✭
    9
    Big Fan of: HOF Post War RC, Graded RCs
    WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
  • mattinglymint23mattinglymint23 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭
    6.5
  • itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭


    << <i>Looks like the card spent time in a photo album. I'd say 7 mk >>



    yeah, that's why i added an ST to mine....but how do they differentiate? I always thought the MK designation was for ink or pencil or other forms of writing on the surface and/or factory defective markings.

    or maybe i should flip mine to TS for Tiger Stripes. image
  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You are all WAAAAAAAAAAAAY OFF!!!!
    opcbaseball.com
  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image
    opcbaseball.com
  • itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭
    still overgraded.
  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭
    Tom ... is that PAPER LOSS above the "J" in Jim on the reverse?
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Tom ... is that PAPER LOSS above the "J" in Jim on the reverse? >>



    No, that is a fish eye
    opcbaseball.com
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,819 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That's got to be a mechanical error. Wow.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭
    j/k btw Tom. image

    but i gotta ask why you subbed that card and what were your honest expectations? i assume a much better grade w/qualifier, hmm?
  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>j/k btw Tom. image

    but i gotta ask why you subbed that card and what were your honest expectations? i assume a much better grade w/qualifier, hmm? >>



    I know you were just kidding, it's cool.

    I was thinking easy 7 with a outside chance at a 8. I just wasn't sure how they would look at the lines on back or if that was even common with these 1971's?
    I found a few in a stack I got in Canada that had lines on back.
    The print dots on front stick out on the scan but in hand the front looks great
    opcbaseball.com
  • itzagoneritzagoner Posts: 8,753 ✭✭
    definitely the classic look of adhesive photomount pages. got a few examples of my own, too.

    it helped that i'd once worked in a camera supply store.
  • OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    definitely the classic look of adhesive photomount pages.


    DING DING DING
  • PiggsPiggs Posts: 1,946 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>definitely the classic look of adhesive photomount pages. got a few examples of my own, too.

    it helped that i'd once worked in a camera supply store. >>



    Yep. I think PSA looks at it as almost tape residue.
Sign In or Register to comment.