Judd-228 MS or Proof??

The PCGS pop report shows 24 of the J-228 (1859 transitional Indian Head cent) graded as 'Proofs' -- along with 274 graded in various MS grades.
On the other hand NGC does not show any 'Proofs' at all for the J-228 -- with 112 graded in MS grades.
Do we conclude NGC does not recognize any J-228's struck as proofs? I think Rick Snow has done some research that showed a certain die pair are identifiable as proofs??
On the other hand NGC does not show any 'Proofs' at all for the J-228 -- with 112 graded in MS grades.
Do we conclude NGC does not recognize any J-228's struck as proofs? I think Rick Snow has done some research that showed a certain die pair are identifiable as proofs??
Ed
0
Comments
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
Dave Bowers recently wrote an article asking if these should be considered regular issues. There is quite a buzz for them right now due to that. What do you think? I've always offered them as a neat extension to the regular set, but not as a regular issue.
From CoinFacts listed as Proof:
Proof
MS
MS
Proof
In the national archives there is a record of about 1000 of the new (reverse) design struck in December 1859 on the regular presses.
Conclusion: The MS pieces were struck as a regular issue and should be recognized as such.
Definitely a cool coin, but I think a bunch will come out on the market now at higher prices (add 50%). They will get snapped up and in a few months settle back to where they are now.