Doubling or just poor lighting? Morgan

Comments

• 3keepSECRETif2rDEAD Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 29, 2014 9:26AM

  looks doubled to me…but in all fairness, I drank a wee bit too much gin last night
  
  Erik

  0
• Unknown

  January 29, 2014 9:29AM

  This content has been removed.
• messydesk Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 29, 2014 9:36AM

  I'd say doubled. Date an mint? 1902-O?

  John
  Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution

  0
• dlmtorts Posts: 743 ✭✭✭

  January 29, 2014 9:37AM

  Not my series but the upper lip makes it look doubled to me.
  

  0
• Unknown

  January 29, 2014 9:40AM

  This content has been removed.
• morbidsteve Posts: 572 ✭✭✭

  January 29, 2014 9:44AM

  Yup sure is a 1902-O. Having trouble VAMing it though.
  
  Steve

  0
• LanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 29, 2014 9:51AM

  .
  i did no comp but for fun i'll say it is an 1878.
  .

  <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  0