Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

This gold $20 is in free fall

A few months back I noticed a plethora of PCGS 1904 $20 Libs in MS66 for sale at Heritage. The coins were not even in auction, but rather offered as "buy now" which certainly seemed odd for this grade. MS65 Liberty's are common, but MS66 Libs have been relatively scarce, at least until recently. I conducted a little research and was shocked at the result.

In 2010, four non CAC PCGS 1904 MS66 Libs sold at auction for an average price of $14,231. In the past month, two non CAC PCGS 1904 MS66 Libs sold at auction for an average price of $7,187. This coin appears to have lost about half its value in three years. What happened here?

Comments

  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat Posts: 24,397 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It is a common date-

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Options
    DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,040 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Increased supply, but unchanged demand?
    When in doubt, don't.
  • Options
    MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 39,472 ✭✭✭✭✭
    what are the buy now prices?

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    I agree other dates in this series have held their value. It would be interesting to see the PCGS pop in 2010 and now. I think the market was flooded.
  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,687 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's hard to judge something like this without actually seeing the coins in hand, and knowing what you're looking at. In other words, when you see the coins in hand, you're going to ask yourself one of two questions. It's either going to be "If this is what a 66 looks like, how could they possibly have gotten so cheap?", or "If this is what a 66 looks like, how could they ever have been so expensive?" Yes, there are other forces at play, but the quality of the coin is the most important determinant of the long term value of a slab.
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    ShortgapbobShortgapbob Posts: 2,332 ✭✭✭
    Pretty much all generic dated gold is dead right now.....even the rarer grade material. Look at how far some of the following have fallen in 3-5 years:

    $20 Liberties MS-66
    $2.50 Indians MS-65 and MS-66
    $3.00 Gold MS-64 and MS-65
    $5.00 Indians MS-65
    $10 Indians MS-66
    $20 Saints in MS-66 MS-67 and MS-68

    There's more examples, but you get the idea. Date rarity gold, for the most part, is much more in demand in the present marketplace.
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." -- Aristotle

    For a large selection of U.S. Coins & Currency, visit The Reeded Edge's online webstore at the link below.

    The Reeded Edge
  • Options
    The generic gold market has plunged over the last few years.
  • Options
    BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,933 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great time to buy, n'est-ce pas?

    I see most generic gold as having tremendous upside due to either rising bullion prices or numismatic demand, or both.

    The downside potential is mitigated when compared to coins with no intrinsic value.

    The above thinking is a little more applicable to common-date Saints or Libs than it is for the OP's coins at MS66 and above. I look at a $500 Morgan as having $475 of numismatic value and $25 of bullion value. I look at a 1924 Saint in MS65 as having $1200 of numismatic value and $1200 of bullion value. Early copper...... well, it's 99.99% numismatic value. image
  • Options
    WTCGWTCG Posts: 8,940 ✭✭✭
    MS66 examples are scarcer than lower grade examples of the date but the 1904 is still the type date of the series. Even in MS66 it's still a widget and prices adjust according to supply, demand and spot price.
    Follow me on Twitter @wtcgroup
    Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"
  • Options
    I think the biggest factor is supply. Sometime within the last year I believe the market was absolutely flooded with 66 Libs. By whom I don't know, but the coins are making their appearance in the new PCGS holders. Its also obvious that CAC common date gold in high grade is maintaining strong premiums, while the non CAC counterparts are in trouble.
  • Options
    derrybderryb Posts: 38,557 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They currently aren't a good investment in gold.

    "A car is a tool that takes you from one place to another. Everything beyond that is a payment for other people's perception of you."

  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>A few months back I noticed a plethora of PCGS 1904 $20 Libs in MS66 for sale at Heritage. The coins were not even in auction, but rather offered as "buy now" which certainly seemed odd for this grade. MS65 Liberty's are common, but MS66 Libs have been relatively scarce, at least until recently. I conducted a little research and was shocked at the result.

    In 2010, four non CAC PCGS 1904 MS66 Libs sold at auction for an average price of $14,231. In the past month, two non CAC PCGS 1904 MS66 Libs sold at auction for an average price of $7,187. This coin appears to have lost about half its value in three years. What happened here? >>




    Looks at the pop explosions in high grade $20 gold pieces from 1998 to 2008. In reality, most generic MS66's are just 65+ coins. But the market needed those coins in that era to fuel the coin and gold boom. It's not much different than calling early US dollars mint state when maybe only 5% of them are. It's not a surprise that as the market has weakened, that these $20 Lib MS66 premiums are falling back to be more closely in line with a 65+ or ++ might be worth. You will see something similar in generic MS67 Saints. They used to be worth $8K or so. Now into the $6K's. Would not surprise me to see the lowest end 67's fall back to say $4500 to $5500 where the finest of stickered 66+ coins live. With CAC only stickering about 5-15% of all mint state gold, they have put on a standard that's very strict. Hence, only 35 MS66 $20 Libs, nearly all of them are 1904. Pick your favorite US series and choose only the top 5% of all specimens in any grade as being "desireable." Imagine what that would do the pricing of the other 95%? This is what stickering has done to the generic gold market along with the loosening of standards from 1998-2008. An "all there" MS66 $20 lib (or even a MS65 for that matter) is still a tough coin. I remember getting a generic box of 35 MS65 $20 Libs back in 2009. Of that group, I don't think a single coin was higher end, and at most a couple pieces were solid or ok for the grade. Nearly the whole box was lower end. It gave me a new outlook on just how tough it was to find "real" MS65 gem $10 and $20 Liberty gold.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,666 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Needs to be in a Doily to hold it's value. image

    image
    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.
  • Options


    << <i>

    << <i>A few months back I noticed a plethora of PCGS 1904 $20 Libs in MS66 for sale at Heritage. The coins were not even in auction, but rather offered as "buy now" which certainly seemed odd for this grade. MS65 Liberty's are common, but MS66 Libs have been relatively scarce, at least until recently. I conducted a little research and was shocked at the result.

    In 2010, four non CAC PCGS 1904 MS66 Libs sold at auction for an average price of $14,231. In the past month, two non CAC PCGS 1904 MS66 Libs sold at auction for an average price of $7,187. This coin appears to have lost about half its value in three years. What happened here? >>




    Looks at the pop explosions in high grade $20 gold pieces from 1998 to 2008. In reality, most generic MS66's are just 65+ coins. But the market needed those coins in that era to fuel the coin and gold boom. It's not much different than calling early US dollars mint state when maybe only 5% of them are. It's not a surprise that as the market has weakened, that these $20 Lib MS66 premiums are falling back to be more closely in line with a 65+ or ++ might be worth. You will see something similar in generic MS67 Saints. They used to be worth $8K or so. Now into the $6K's. Would not surprise me to see the lowest end 67's fall back to say $4500 to $5500 where the finest of stickered 66+ coins live. With CAC only stickering about 5-15% of all mint state gold, they have put on a standard that's very strict. Hence, only 35 MS66 $20 Libs, nearly all of them are 1904. Pick your favorite US series and choose only the top 5% of all specimens in any grade as being "desireable." Imagine what that would do the pricing of the other 95%? This is what stickering has done to the generic gold market along with the looseing of standards from 1998-2008. An "all there" MS66 $20 lib (or even a MS65 for that matter) is still a tough coin. I remember getting a generic box of 35 MS65 $20 Libs back in 2009. Of that group, I don't think a single coin was higher end, and at most a couple pieces were solid or ok for the grade. Nearly the whole box was lower end. It gave me a new outlook on just how tough it was to find "real" MS65 gem $10 and $20 Liberty gold. >>



    I think this is great analysis, thank you for the insights
  • Options
    bidaskbidask Posts: 14,057 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Great time to buy, n'est-ce pas?

    I see most generic gold as having tremendous upside due to either rising bullion prices or numismatic demand, or both.

    The downside potential is mitigated when compared to coins with no intrinsic value.

    The above thinking is a little more applicable to common-date Saints or Libs than it is for the OP's coins at MS66 and above. I look at a $500 Morgan as having $475 of numismatic value and $25 of bullion value. I look at a 1924 Saint in MS65 as having $1200 of numismatic value and $1200 of bullion value. Early copper...... well, it's 99.99% numismatic value. image >>

    A 1924 saint in ms 65 with 1200 dollar numimatic value ?

    Do you realize how common that coin is?

    I would not pay more than $400 numismatic value.
    Seriously

    I also realize I probably would not buy any either but that's all they
    are worth to me,
    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • Options
    bidaskbidask Posts: 14,057 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Needs to be in a Doily to hold it's value. imageThat coin even in a doily is ugly for a 65 !

    image >>

    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • Options
    SonorandesertratSonorandesertrat Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Roadrunner's analysis is spot on (as usual).
    Member: EAC, NBS, C4, CWTS, ANA

    RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'

    CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
  • Options
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,029 ✭✭✭✭✭
    When I buy something , the price goes down. After I sell it, it goes it goes back up. This has been my experience for years. Others have different experiences. Grading is subjective, but the market is always open.
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>A 1924 saint in ms 65 with 1200 dollar numismatic value ?

    Do you realize how common that coin is?

    I would not pay more than $400 numismatic value.
    Seriously

    I also realize I probably would not buy any either but that's all they
    are worth to me, >>




    You're probably in the top 5% (or lower 5% depending on one's view). I don't think we have to debate about $1200 in numis value considering that a Saint now has $1160 in intrinsic gold value. Which means an MS65 is carrying approx $650-$700 in "numis" value. Or put another way, a 60% premium to its gold content. Provide me with a list of all the min of 80-100 year old regular issue US mint coins in MS65 that carry a 60% premium to metal content in gem condition (hint...it's a very short list).

    The most obvious choice would be MS65 common Morgans at $150.....that's 900% premium (10X) to its metal content. Holy crap. Do you realize how common MS65 Morgans are? We could also consider MS65 late 1920's Lincs, Buffs, Mercs that probably carry a 100X premium to their metal content. The real question is, why does a MS65 Saint only carry a 60% premium to spot? Why isn't a MS65 1880-s Morgan a $24 coin like the Saint? I was checking out the BST the other day and there was a 5,000 count bag of circ wheat cents for sale at $200 (4x face value). Today's intrinsic metal value is 2.17 cents. Holy crap. At 4c each that seller is asking an 84% premium to spot metal.....that's 40% higher than the MS65 Saint's ratio. Gem 100 yr old gold vs. a circ piece of 1950's copper? Do you know how common wheat cents are? They made 20 Billion or so of those. That's $200 MILL in spendable face value.

    My point? Let's not just beat up on the gem Saints. There are plenty of other areas that one could call "overpriced" as well vs. their metal content and numismatic availability. The MS63 Saints are down at the 20% over spot level....about on par with the premium for a VG common date Morgan. Are those "rare?". Along with the huge numbers that all of these exist in comes huge demand. The nearly one ounce of gold inside that MS65 Saint has a lot of demand. Even when gold was a lowly $320 back in Sept 2002 your common MS65 Saint was a $750-$900 coin....a 150-200% premium. It's not like they're heading back to $450 anytime soon. Is a 60% premium that outlandish? I recall back in Nov 2009 when gold was nearing a new high of $1225 that MS65 Saints were up to $2500-$2800. Even 64's were around $2,000. They may have a lot more downside to them if gold continues to spend a lot of time at lower and lower numbers. But from my recollection of the past 12 years, I don't recall a premium ever lower than the current 60% for MS65's. Circ wheat cents have it better. There's more to pricing here than just the pops vs. gold price.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    bidaskbidask Posts: 14,057 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>A 1924 saint in ms 65 with 1200 dollar numismatic value ?

    Do you realize how common that coin is?

    I would not pay more than $400 numismatic value.
    Seriously

    I also realize I probably would not buy any either but that's all they
    are worth to me, >>




    You're probably in the top 5% (or lower 5% depending on one's view). I don't think we have to debate about $1200 in numis value considering that a Saint now has $1160 in intrinsic gold value. Which means an MS65 is carrying approx $650-$700 in "numis" value. Or put another way, a 60% premium to its gold content. Provide me with a list of all the min of 80-100 year old MS65 US coins that carry a 60% premium to metal content in gem condition.

    The most obvious choice would be MS65 common Morgans at $150.....that's 900% premium (10X) to its metal content. Holy crap. Do you realize how common MS65 Morgans are? We could also consider MS65 late 1920's Lincs, Buffs, Mercs that probably carry a 100X premium to their metal content. The real question is, why does a MS65 Saint only carry a 60% premium to spot? Why isn't a MS65 1880-s Morgan a $24 coin like the Saint? >>

    The OP did not say anything about 'gems'. Sure I will pay more than 60% for a true 'gem' 65 liberty....
    You keep using that qualifying word in these kind of discussions. Not talking about gems.....just your ordinary slabbed 65 like the OP intended.

    If you want to pay a 60% premium for a coin like Lakesammman showed..... have at it,

    At a 60% premium over spot those coins are overvalued imo.

    Hit the BID !



    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The OP did not say anything about 'gems'. Sure I will pay more than 60% for a true 'gem' 65 liberty....
    You keep using that qualifying word in these kind of discussions. Not talking about gems.....just your ordinary slabbed 65 like the OP intended.

    If you want to pay a 60% premium for a coin like Lakesammman showed..... have at it,

    At a 60% premium over spot those coins are overvalued imo.

    Hit the BID !



    The OP was discussing GEM MS65 and MS66 $20 Libs until "someone" derailed the thread to state their dislike for MS65 Saints at current prices. But, I'm glad that you'd pay more than 60% over spot for a true gem
    MS65 $20 Liberty ($1850). Unfortunately, that won't get you many pieces since generic 65's fetch close to 160% of spot ($3,000) and nice ones are $4,000. And why is it important to talk about "real" gems in the discussion?
    It's because more so than any US series, gem $20's have seen exceptional gradeflation over the 1998-2008 period. The lower grades didn't see this. You can't discuss gem $20's w/o talking about the significant inflation at the
    gem grade level. "All there" MS65 gem $20 Libs are not common coins, neither are MS66's whether average to low end. Bidask, when was the last time you owned a MS65 $20 Lib?

    As far as Heritage offering a plethora of MS66 $20 Libs at auction there could be a number of reasons for those showing up at once. Maybe someone unloaded their personal stash. Maybe those were a fresh group of coins that
    Heritage recently pulled out of Europe. In every major auction there are always a number of them. At other than major coin shows or auctions, I never see them. As Mr Eureka has suggested, the variation in quality of these
    MS65 to MS66 $20 Libs is so large than to discuss price w/o reference to quality is a waste of time. There are low end MS66's I wouldn't want to pay $6500 for. And no doubt there are 66's that I couldn't get $10K out of my
    check book fast enough.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    AMRCAMRC Posts: 4,280 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hmmmm....

    Something is not right. Here is what our host is saying has been the trend for 10 years.

    image
    MLAeBayNumismatics: "The greatest hobby in the world!"
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'll say that chart is not right, especially for a MS66 $5 gold. If that coin is held steady since 2006 then it's the only $5 or $10 that has done so.

    Most of the other MS65/66 $2-1/2's, $3's, $5's, and $10's, are about half of what they were in 2006/2008. I recall MS65 $10 Indians at $7500 back then....and $3,000 or so today.
    There's no way that an average MS66 $5 Lib got a free pass while everything else in smaller denomination gold got hammered. Could be that the retail boost in the price guide is much higher today
    than it was in 2006/2008. I generally see a 50% boost over wholesale in the price guide for coins that are fairly available on the market. PCGS MS66's (non stickered) were fetching in the mid to upper
    $4K's in 2013 on Heritage archives. I suspect that average MS66's back in 2006 were really fetching $7K or more.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    bidaskbidask Posts: 14,057 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The OP did not say anything about 'gems'. Sure I will pay more than 60% for a true 'gem' 65 liberty....
    You keep using that qualifying word in these kind of discussions. Not talking about gems.....just your ordinary slabbed 65 like the OP intended.

    If you want to pay a 60% premium for a coin like Lakesammman showed..... have at it,

    At a 60% premium over spot those coins are overvalued imo.

    Hit the BID !



    The OP was discussing GEM MS65 and MS66 $20 Libs until "someone" derailed the thread to state their dislike for MS65 Saints at current prices. But, I'm glad that you'd pay more than 60% over spot for a true gem
    MS65 $20 Liberty ($1850). Unfortunately, that won't get you many pieces since generic 65's fetch close to 160% of spot ($3,000) and nice ones are $4,000. And why is it important to talk about "real" gems in the discussion?
    It's because more so than any US series, gem $20's have seen exceptional gradeflation over the 1998-2008 period. The lower grades didn't see this. You can't discuss gem $20's w/o talking about the significant inflation at the
    gem grade level. "All there" MS65 gem $20 Libs are not common coins, neither are MS66's whether average to low end. Bidask, when was the last time you owned a MS65 $20 Lib?

    As far as Heritage offering a plethora of MS66 $20 Libs at auction there could be a number of reasons for those showing up at once. Maybe someone unloaded their personal stash. Maybe those were a fresh group of coins that
    Heritage recently pulled out of Europe. In every major auction there are always a number of them. At other than major coin shows or auctions, I never see them. As Mr Eureka has suggested, the variation in quality of these
    MS65 to MS66 $20 Libs is so large than to discuss price w/o reference to quality is a waste of time. There are low end MS66's I wouldn't want to pay $6500 for. And no doubt there are 66's that I couldn't get $10K out of my
    check book fast enough. >>

    Whoever is unloading at Heritage is smart. And no, the OP was not talking about 'gems'.image
    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    For the 40 years that I've followed high grade mint state coins MS65 has always defined the minimum level for a "gem" coin. Anything from MS65 to MS70 is still gem. But, I'd love to hear your preferred terminology for MS65 vs. MS66.

    Whoever the person is unloading at Heritage isn't so smart....if they've owned the coins for more than 8 months. And unloading after a 50% decline....that may not be so smart either. The last time I bought MS65 $20 Libs in quantity was in late Dec 2008 when gold was around $850/oz. "GEM" $20 Libs were in the $3,000-$3,200 price range.....much like they are now. They had fallen from $5,000+ or so. They seemed stupid cheap. I bought approx 35 pieces in one deal....all common dates. Anyone selling them at $3,100 at that time was "smart" to get out....they could have gone to $0. I hung on to them for about a year and sold them all for $5,000-$5,200 as gold was was approaching a new all time at $1220/oz in Nov 2009. And you're probably right that it may be getting close to that time to "hit that bid" again.

    Heritage has auctioned off 8 - 1904 PCGS MS66 $20 Libs in 2013. That doesn't quite seem to be that the sky is falling. when there are 168 - 1904 Phillies graded. In June/July a couple of non-stickered pieces brought $9400 to $9600. Quality determines price. The last stickered 1904 PCGS 66 sold by Heritage was in Oct 2012 - brought nearly $13,000. No doubt that low end quality brings low end money....more so than ever.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    bidaskbidask Posts: 14,057 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>For the 40 years that I've followed high grade mint state coins MS65 has always defined the minimum level for a "gem" coin. Anything from MS65 to MS70 is still gem. But, I'd love to hear your preferred terminology for MS65 vs. MS66.

    Whoever the person is unloading at Heritage isn't so smart....if they've owned the coins for more than 8 months. And unloading after a 50% decline....that may not be so smart either. The last time I bought MS65 $20 Libs in quantity was in late Dec 2008 when gold was around $850/oz. "GEM" $20 Libs were in the $3,000-$3,200 price range.....much like they are now. They had fallen from $5,000+ or so. They seemed stupid cheap. I bought approx 35 pieces in one deal....all common dates. Anyone selling them at $3,100 at that time was "smart" to get out....they could have gone to $0. I hung on to them for about a year and sold them all for $5,000-$5,200 as gold was was approaching a new all time at $1220/oz in Nov 2009. And you're probably right that it may be getting close to that time to "hit that bid" again.

    Heritage has auctioned off 8 - 1904 PCGS MS66 $20 Libs in 2013. That doesn't quite seem to be that the sky is falling. when there are 168 - 1904 Phillies graded. In June/July a couple of non-stickered pieces brought $9400 to $9600. Quality determines price. The last stickered 1904 PCGS 66 sold by Heritage was in Oct 2012 - brought nearly $13,000. No doubt that low end quality brings low end money....more so than ever. >>

    Roadrunner, here is a comment you posted in this thread: " I remember getting a generic box of 35 MS65 $20 Libs back in 2009. Of that group, I don't think a single coin was higher end, and at most a couple pieces were solid or ok for the grade. Nearly the whole box was lower end. It gave me a new outlook on just how tough it was to find "real" MS65 gem $10 and $20 Liberty gold. "

    Now your saying: "For the 40 years that I've followed high grade mint state coins MS65 has always defined the minimum level for a "gem" coin. Anything from MS65 to MS70 is still gem"

    Anything?

    So once again your talking out both sides of your mouth.

    So which is it?
    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file