<< <i>Those are super! Why does it seem less of this material is seen with terminal toning than other coins, like Morgans? I really do not know.
Eric >>
The coins pictured are the best of the best which they are because they don't have said "terminal toning". There is on the Ther other hand quite a lot of dark to too dark 18th cen American silver out there. I have seen many of them straight black
Comments
CoinFacts Cruzin' is what us coin geeks do instead of reading Playboy.
Keeping with the early coin theme....
VF25:
[URL=http://s1016.photobucket.com/user/sethstellacapcom/media/1797Half25.jpg.html]
MS68:
<< <i>CoinFacts Cruzin' is what us coin geeks do instead of reading Playboy. >>
I wouldn't go that far brother…wait a second…people read Playboy
Erik
Hoard the keys.
Eric
<< <i>Those are super! Why does it seem less of this material is seen with terminal toning than other coins, like Morgans? I really do not know.
Eric
The coins pictured are the best of the best which they are because they don't have said "terminal toning". There is on the Ther other hand quite a lot of dark to too dark 18th cen American silver out there. I have seen many of them straight black
<< <i>Those are super! Why does it seem less of this material is seen with terminal toning than other coins, like Morgans? I really do not know. >>
They weren't stored in reactive bags for decades, perhaps?
<< <i>Those are super! Why does it seem less of this material is seen with terminal toning than other coins, like Morgans? I really do not know. >>
Because much of this early material is seen with secondary toning.
<< <i>
<< <i>Those are super! Why does it seem less of this material is seen with terminal toning than other coins, like Morgans? I really do not know. >>
Because much of this early material is seen with secondary toning. >>
That is what I was getting at
Eric