Options
1st weekend of college football
edmundfitzgerald
Posts: 4,306 ✭✭
Who ya rootin' for, and who ya like to take it all ?
0
Comments
PSA HOF Baseball Postwar Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 80.51% Complete)
PSA Pro Football HOF Rookie Players Set Registry- (Currently 19.80% Complete)
PSA Basketball HOF Players Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 6.02% Complete)
Edited to add: the Tide probably take it all, but if Clemson can win tonight, they'll have a good shot of running the table on their schedule...would be interesting to seethe ACC on top again. I think Tahj Boyd takes the Heisman.
eBay Store
Greg Maddux #1 Master SetGreg Maddux #2 Basic Set
<< <i>Who ya rootin' for, and who ya like to take it all ? >>
I just got home from the Sooner victory, so I'd better be rooting for them. I also work at OU.
Other teams I root for:
Penn State...I got a degree there.
Ohio State...I listened to them on the radio as a kid.
Kent State...I'm from Kent
<< <i>
<< <i>Who ya rootin' for, and who ya like to take it all ? >>
I just got home from the Sooner victory, so I'd better be rooting for them. I also work at OU.
Other teams I root for:
Penn State...I got a degree there.
Ohio State...I listened to them on the radio as a kid.
Kent State...I'm from Kent >>
Awesome! I am a current student at Penn State. It's always nice to hear about PSU alums!!
PSA HOF Baseball Postwar Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 80.51% Complete)
PSA Pro Football HOF Rookie Players Set Registry- (Currently 19.80% Complete)
PSA Basketball HOF Players Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 6.02% Complete)
My son is 17 months old and still hasn't seen my alma mater beat a conference opponent...it'll be tough again this year.
Ugh...but still:
I-L-L!
Also a chip Kelly fan, so I'd like to see him do well in Philadelphia. But he's always welcome back to UO.
<< <i>im not a HUGE fan but I root for Oregon and Oregon state!
Also a chip Kelly fan, so I'd like to see him do well in Philadelphia. But he's always welcome back to UO. >>
Oy vey on OSU but at least the Ducks beat the division III team. Go Ducks!
Nice to see a top 5 sec team go down.
Jmaciu's Collection
the only team i really dislike is miami (couldn't stand that team under the guy with the nice hair).
edit: not sure alabama can run the table in the sec, so they may not make the championship game. i predict the stanford/oregon winner will play ohio state in the big game.
eyebone
<< <i>the fighting irish. i know some don't like them >>
Some? A ton don't like them, LOL. Screw the haters! GO IRISH!!!
Loves: My beloved Razorbacks (be fine with a 6-6 reg season and a bowl game with a tough sked in first year of Bielema era)
Dislikes: Big 10 football
Hates: OU, Texas
Nat champ: By my reckoning, Bama 60% LSU 30% rest of SEC 10%
Kingnascar's PSA Sets
Kingnascar's PSADNA Sets
On Topic: I'm an Ohio State fan. Born that way, and will die that way. I also went to Toledo, so I root for the Rockets as well. I thought defensively they played the Gators tough, but couldn't get the offense going. Rather expected though, since the game was in the Swamp.
<< <i>Talk about a flawed voting system. Ohio State has the longest winning streak in the nation, and they drop in the rankings lol. >>
A #2 seed losing 2 quarters to SUNY Buffalo while never in contention to cover the -34 spread and add to it that UB was only down 10 well into the 4th quarter makes me thinks OSU should drop rank as you get these gimmie games to run up the score against weak competition. A blowout in this awkward match-up should never had been in doubt and it most certainly was never a blowout.
<< <i>...add to it that UB was only down 10 well into the 4th quarter >>
It was 37-20 when the 4th quarter started.
<< <i>A #2 seed losing 2 quarters to SUNY Buffalo >>
They only lost 1 quarter.
<< <i>while never in contention to cover the -34 spread >>
Since when does sports betting have anything to do with how they determine rankings?
<< <i>and add to it that UB was only down 10 well into the 4th quarter >>
They were only down 10 with 3:16 left in the 3RD quarter.
<< <i>you get these gimmie games to run up the score against weak competition >>
Ohio State has never been a team who runs up the score on an opponent. They leave that up to teams with an inferiority complex. *cough* Wisconsin *cough*
<< <i>A blowout in this awkward match-up should never had been in doubt and it most certainly was never a blowout. >>
You're right, being up three scores isn't enough. Maybe they should have left their starters in. Good talk.
<< <i>..me thinks OSU should drop rank as you get these gimmie games to run up the score against weak competition. >>
The irony is that the team that leap-frogged Ohio State -- Oregon -- defeated Mighty Nicholls State.
<< <i>
<< <i>A #2 seed losing 2 quarters to SUNY Buffalo >>
They only lost 1 quarter.
<< <i>while never in contention to cover the -34 spread >>
Since when does sports betting have anything to do with how they determine rankings?
<< <i>and add to it that UB was only down 10 well into the 4th quarter >>
They were only down 10 with 3:16 left in the 3RD quarter.
<< <i>you get these gimmie games to run up the score against weak competition >>
Ohio State has never been a team who runs up the score on an opponent. They leave that up to teams with an inferiority complex. *cough* Wisconsin *cough*
<< <i>A blowout in this awkward match-up should never had been in doubt and it most certainly was never a blowout. >>
You're right, being up three scores isn't enough. Maybe they should have left their starters in. Good talk. >>
Agreed.
Also 3 starters did not play due to suspension. Their #2 running back had 159 yds rushing.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>A #2 seed losing 2 quarters to SUNY Buffalo >>
They only lost 1 quarter.
<< <i>while never in contention to cover the -34 spread >>
Since when does sports betting have anything to do with how they determine rankings?
<< <i>and add to it that UB was only down 10 well into the 4th quarter >>
They were only down 10 with 3:16 left in the 3RD quarter.
<< <i>you get these gimmie games to run up the score against weak competition >>
Ohio State has never been a team who runs up the score on an opponent. They leave that up to teams with an inferiority complex. *cough* Wisconsin *cough*
<< <i>A blowout in this awkward match-up should never had been in doubt and it most certainly was never a blowout. >>
You're right, being up three scores isn't enough. Maybe they should have left their starters in. Good talk. >>
Agreed.
Also 3 starters did not play due to suspension. Their #2 running back had 159 yds rushing. >>
I should have looked closer at the boxscore after I turned off the game shaking my head and UB had the ball with around 4 minutes to go in the 3rd only down 10. I take no blame that you all had to hear my senseless drivel because 1) you were on notice that I was a UB alum and thus have no clue about elite college football and 2) I would never had replied if this thread was properly posted in the sports talk section where it belonged.
<< <i>I would never had replied if this thread was properly posted in the sports talk section where it belonged.
Now THAT is something that we can both agree on.