Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Newer SLQ's - Recent images

MFHMFH Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭

I have been picking up a few upgrades for my SLQ collection...
and I had one coin regraded [ 1919-S ] ... images by MessyDesk:

image

image

image

image

.......and lastly, the only AU 58+ CAC I have ever seen.....

image
Mike Hayes
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !

New Barber Purchases

Comments

  • Options
    thisnamztakenthisnamztaken Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice coins and MessyDesk's pix are great too.
    I never thought that growing old would happen so fast.
    - Jim
  • Options
    jomjom Posts: 3,425 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think the 1920 should be FH....at least from the photo...

    jom
  • Options
    LogPotatoLogPotato Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭✭
    I was going to say the same thing as jom. Why isn't the 20P a FH? I know little about grading these, so any insight would be great.

    Some very nice looking Standing Libs, Mike! image
  • Options
    coinlieutenantcoinlieutenant Posts: 9,305 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Never understood the AU58+ grade..... plus to what?
  • Options
    jomjom Posts: 3,425 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I was going to say the same thing as jom. Why isn't the 20P a FH? I know little about grading these, so any insight would be great.

    Some very nice looking Standing Libs, Mike! image >>



    One thing I can tell you from personal experience: I'm not surprised Mike's 1920 didn't get CAC'd (assuming it has already been set in)...JA seems to be excessively picky on what constitutes a "gem" SLQ. The 28-S got it though.

    As to the FH, I agree with you. Even with that small of a photo that sure looks FH to me...I know I've seen worse in FH holders. That one seems clear cut. It's also typical of the 1920 in that there is a full shield and the "1" in the date is weak.

    The 19-S has FH possibilities as well but you can't see that one as well. Need close-ups!

    jom
  • Options
    They are beautiful . The 20 is not a FH. The 3 leaves are not present.
    Home of the ehew ehew bird!
  • Options
    thisnamztakenthisnamztaken Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I was going to say the same thing as jom. Why isn't the 20P a FH? >>



    It has the ear "hole" but it's hard to tell from the photo whether the hairline is totally unbroken. Maybe the graders thought it faded out too much in the area above the eye? image
    I never thought that growing old would happen so fast.
    - Jim
  • Options
    jomjom Posts: 3,425 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Never understood the AU58+ grade..... plus to what? >>



    I interpret that as just being a high-end AU58. I don't think it's that difficult.

    However, I understand the confusion but that is more of a fundamental issue with the AU58 grade as it is defined....regardless of whether there is a "+" or not.

    jom
  • Options
    jomjom Posts: 3,425 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>They are beautiful . The 20 is not a FH. The 3 leaves are not present. >>



    Your probably right but I can't see that in the photo. We need close-ups! C'mon Mike! What happened to those gigantic, download choking photos you usually post? lol

    jom
  • Options
    BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,152 ✭✭✭
    That 58+ is as BU as I've ever seen! image

    Nice newps, Mike! imageimageimageimageimage
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist.
  • Options
    Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,252 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That 30P looks like a Broadstruck "AU64" special!
    But that 19S is a real moose, and with nice color to boot.

    Successful BST transactions with 170 members. Recent: Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Options
    AuroraBorealisAuroraBorealis Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Awesome! Great coins! The 19-S and 1920 are my favs...

    ABimage
  • Options
    BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,017 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I was going to say the same thing as jom. Why isn't the 20P a FH? I know little about grading these, so any insight would be great.

    Some very nice looking Standing Libs, Mike! image >>



    One thing I can tell you from personal experience: I'm not surprised Mike's 1920 didn't get CAC'd (assuming it has already been set in)...JA seems to be excessively picky on what constitutes a "gem" SLQ. The 28-S got it though.

    As to the FH, I agree with you. Even with that small of a photo that sure looks FH to me...I know I've seen worse in FH holders. That one seems clear cut. It's also typical of the 1920 in that there is a full shield and the "1" in the date is weak.

    The 19-S has FH possibilities as well but you can't see that one as well. Need close-ups!

    jom >>



    The only 2 ms65 SLQs that I ever submitted to CAC both beaned.

    image
    image

    image
    image


    theknowitalltroll;
  • Options
    MFHMFH Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭
    I applied to CAC for membership about a month and a half ago
    but decided to get some coins imaged anyway.

    While the coins were at MessyDesk's home, I received my CAC
    package. Once I have all my submissions back from PCGS, and
    the coins from MessyDesk, I'll put together a submission to CAC.

    I had not planned on submitting that many coins to CAC as I have
    always felt that this is something done immediately before selling.

    Where you posted your 1927-D - I thought I's show mine off as well
    although its not graded as high as your's, its a decent coin, IMHO.
    No, it has not been sent for its Green Bean before...
    image

    image
    Mike Hayes
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !

    New Barber Purchases
  • Options
    BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,017 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I applied to CAC for membership about a month and a half ago
    but decided to get some coins imaged anyway.

    While the coins were at MessyDesk's home, I received my CAC
    package. Once I have all my submissions back from PCGS, and
    the coins from MessyDesk, I'll put together a submission to CAC.

    I had not planned on submitting that many coins to CAC as I have
    always felt that this is something done immediately before selling.

    Where you posted your 1927-D - I thought I's show mine off as well
    although its not graded as high as your's, its a decent coin, IMHO.
    No, it has not been sent for its Green Bean before...
    image

    I posted the pics just to back up my claim and avoid a TPIUWP comment.
    theknowitalltroll;

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file