AT or NT?

Comments

• Constantine Posts: 2,369 ✭✭✭

  January 9, 2013 9:15AM

  I have faith with PCGS on this one.

  0
• Kove Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭✭

  January 9, 2013 9:24AM

  NT, but neutral to me.

  0
• AUandAG Posts: 24,940 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 9, 2013 9:32AM

  I think the coin without color is plus or minus $200.
  
  
  bob

  Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  

  0
• braddick Posts: 24,823 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 9, 2013 9:40AM

  
  
  << <i>I think the coin without color is plus or minus $200.
  
  
  bob >>
  
  
  
  In (PCGS) GEM, closer to $300.

  peacockcoins

  0
• AUandAG Posts: 24,940 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 9, 2013 9:56AM

  
  
  << <i>
  
  << <i>I think the coin without color is plus or minus $200.
  
  
  bob >>
  
  
  
  In (PCGS) GEM, closer to $300. >>
  
  
  
  PCGS guide is high on these, IMO

  Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  

  0
• SUMORADA Posts: 4,797 ✭

  January 9, 2013 10:15AM

  
  Looks NT........but the color on the Rev. is too dark and the color on the obv. is ugly......JMO

  coins on ebay

  0
• braddick Posts: 24,823 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 9, 2013 10:17AM

  
  
  << <i>
  
  << <i>
  
  << <i>I think the coin without color is plus or minus $200.
  
  
  bob >>
  
  
  
  In (PCGS) GEM, closer to $300. >>
  
  
  
  PCGS guide is high on these, IMO >>
  
  
  
  I think you're right.
  Probably has to be an absolutely killer example, dripping in luster to warrant the higher price.

  peacockcoins

  0
• Tiny Posts: 2,598

  January 9, 2013 11:02AM

  
  Well PCGS graded it so it's has to be NT, right? I think the coin is too dark and the light has to be
  just right and the angle just right to see the colors on the rev. Don't like it at that money or even
  at $265. GS money.
  
  
  
  

  0
• 7Jaguars Posts: 7,750 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 10, 2013 2:12AM

  OMG, people have to think and judge for themselves. Love our hosts, but IMO they do not always get it right. I would ding this coin for appearance - not pleasant appearance...

  Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
  Well, just Love coins, period.

  0
• LanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 10, 2013 2:14AM

  .
  pcgs eye appeal guidelines
  .

  <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  0
• morgansforever Posts: 8,484 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 10, 2013 2:17AM

  IMO the color doesn't add much of a premium. It's neither ugly or spectacular, somewhere in the middle.
  

  World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO

  0
• 19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭

  January 10, 2013 2:22AM

  
  
  << <i>IMO the color doesn't add much of a premium. It's neither ugly or spectacular, somewhere in the middle. >>
  
  I'll have to agree with you on this.

  I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
  
  
  
  The name is LEE!

  0
• Bankerbob56 Posts: 1,399 ✭✭✭

  January 10, 2013 2:23AM

  This seller typically has nicely toned coins. This one is an exception IMHO. It is not attractive at all. Price is high, but I wouldn't own this coin for anything over melt.... it is that unattractive to me!!

  What we've got here is failure to communicate.....
  
  Successful BST xactions w/PCcoins, Drunner, Manofcoins, Rampage, docg, Poppee, RobKool, and MichealDixon.

  0
• johnny9434 Posts: 29,258 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 10, 2013 5:25AM

  no comment here.

  0
• braddick Posts: 24,823 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 10, 2013 7:22AM

  The response above mine and then the one exactly above that one truly planted a grin on my face.
  Thanks guys for joking around.
  It's appreciated!
  Sometimes we take our coins too seriously and you two really know how to lighten the mood with your good humor.

  peacockcoins

  0
• coinguy1989 Posts: 1,056 ✭✭

  January 10, 2013 9:32AM

  
  
  << <i>NT, but neutral to me. >>
  
  
  
  This. I wouldn't pay a premium for it.

  0
• Justlooking Posts: 2,895 ✭

  January 10, 2013 9:34AM

  NT, but the toning ain't great.
  
  HOWEVER, under bright light, it's probably pretty nice ...

  Let's try not to get upset.

  0
• magikbilly Posts: 6,780 ✭

  January 10, 2013 9:52AM

  Photos are probably not helping. That is not ugly for goodness sake. I think it rather pretty.
  
  Eric

  0