1944 Jefferson struck on steel planchet

I saw this on E-bay today. Looks like a neat error coin. Probably more rare than a cent struck on a steel planchet.
Curious to see what it finally sells for.
1944 Steel Nickel
Mark
Curious to see what it finally sells for.
1944 Steel Nickel
Mark
Mark
0
Comments
<< <i>Curious to see what it finally sells for.
Mark >>
pcgs says $5 !
I snagged one on eBay a couple years ago for "rather less than that".
I'd rather own a 1944 cent struck on a steel planchet.
Mark
Mark
Trivia question: Why is this NOT an example of a transitional error?
<< <i>The seller in the linked eBay listing calls this a transitional error. A transitional error happens when a coin is struck one year on a planchet that wasn't supposed to be in production that year. Some examples would be a 1965 dime/quarter/half struck on a silver planchet, a 1964 dime/quarter/half struck on a clad planchet, etc.
Trivia question: Why is this NOT an example of a transitional error? >>
In 1944 the Mint used the same planchets to strike Belgium 2 Francs.
<< <i>PCGS does not place a value on errors, only the piece, in this case they price a 1944 P Jefferson at $5 >>
I am certain that was sarcasm on the poster's comment.
<< <i>
<< <i>The seller in the linked eBay listing calls this a transitional error. A transitional error happens when a coin is struck one year on a planchet that wasn't supposed to be in production that year. Some examples would be a 1965 dime/quarter/half struck on a silver planchet, a 1964 dime/quarter/half struck on a clad planchet, etc.
Trivia question: Why is this NOT an example of a transitional error? >>
In 1944 the Mint used the same planchets to strike Belgium 2 Francs. >>
Right, which means technically this is struck on a foreign planchet, not a transitional cent planchet.
Also, jonathanb, you said:
<< <i>I snagged one on eBay a couple years ago for "rather less than that". >>
You are being very modest, I remember that coin and it was an impressive bit of cherrypicking.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>
<< <i>The seller in the linked eBay listing calls this a transitional error. A transitional error happens when a coin is struck one year on a planchet that wasn't supposed to be in production that year. Some examples would be a 1965 dime/quarter/half struck on a silver planchet, a 1964 dime/quarter/half struck on a clad planchet, etc.
Trivia question: Why is this NOT an example of a transitional error? >>
In 1944 the Mint used the same planchets to strike Belgium 2 Francs. >>
A very grey (pun intended) area. One could argue that the Belgian coins were struck on U.S. planchets that we gave the Belgian government because we were not using them anymore.
I consider this to be a Transitional Error with an asterisk.
TD
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>The seller in the linked eBay listing calls this a transitional error. A transitional error happens when a coin is struck one year on a planchet that wasn't supposed to be in production that year. Some examples would be a 1965 dime/quarter/half struck on a silver planchet, a 1964 dime/quarter/half struck on a clad planchet, etc.
Trivia question: Why is this NOT an example of a transitional error? >>
In 1944 the Mint used the same planchets to strike Belgium 2 Francs. >>
A very grey (pun intended) area. One could argue that the Belgian coins were struck on U.S. planchets that we gave the Belgian government because we were not using them anymore.
I consider this to be a Transitional Error with an asterisk.
TD >>
Then why do the 44 Steel cents receive the lime light as opposed to this coin? A 44 Nickel struck on a wrong denomination steel planchet seems far more impressive IMO.
<< <i>A very grey (pun intended) area. One could argue that the Belgian coins were struck on U.S. planchets that we gave the Belgian government because we were not using them anymore. >>
The key point in my mind is that we didn't give them until they were struck... and the striking happened in the Philadelphia mint. So they planchets were supposed to be in the building in 1944, even if not between the nickel dies.
I *would* consider 1944-D and 1944-S nickels on steel planchets to be transitional errors.
You'll notice that all three of the pieces discussed in this thread (the one currently on eBay, the one from Bowers and Merena 9 years ago, and the one that I snagged) are all 1944-P specimens.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>The seller in the linked eBay listing calls this a transitional error. A transitional error happens when a coin is struck one year on a planchet that wasn't supposed to be in production that year. Some examples would be a 1965 dime/quarter/half struck on a silver planchet, a 1964 dime/quarter/half struck on a clad planchet, etc.
Trivia question: Why is this NOT an example of a transitional error? >>
In 1944 the Mint used the same planchets to strike Belgium 2 Francs. >>
A very grey (pun intended) area. One could argue that the Belgian coins were struck on U.S. planchets that we gave the Belgian government because we were not using them anymore.
I consider this to be a Transitional Error with an asterisk.
TD >>
Then why do the 44 Steel cents receive the lime light as opposed to this coin? A 44 Nickel struck on a wrong denomination steel planchet seems far more impressive IMO. >>
Because "1943 copper pennies" have received a lot of press in the non-numismatic press over the years, and their "1944 steel penny" cousins get caught up in the enthusiasm.
A complete 1943-PDS bronze and 1944-PDS steel set is a fabulous collection (we had a customer who had five of the six, and wanted to complete it). A 1944-P nickel on a steel cent planchet is a wonderful error, but an odd duck that stands alone.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
<< <i>Sean, how low do you think it will go before someone snags it? I really like the error, but too rich for my blood right now. >>
It will be snagged at 1500. If the seller is willing!
<< <i>
<< <i>Sean, how low do you think it will go before someone snags it? I really like the error, but too rich for my blood right now. >>
It will be snagged at 1500. If the seller is willing! >>
I'd be a buyer at that price, and even a little more.
My Adolph A. Weinman signature
