Is the search function even functional?

morgansforever · October 13, 2012 10:44PM

No matter what I type in the fields I get, "The page you were accessing requires variables to be passed to it.
Error Code: 100".
ATS viewing the threads I've generated is simple.
How is it done with Fusetalk? Not having any luck at all.

Staircoins · October 13, 2012 10:55PM

I can get it to work okay using IE8.

Barry · October 13, 2012 10:55PM

Only if you're running DOS or using a Commodore 64.

morgansforever · October 13, 2012 11:03PM

I was attempting to search all the threads I've generated.
Using IE8 I'm able to search threads I've responded to, but that's not what I want.

DorkGirl · October 13, 2012 11:04PM

<< Only if you're running DOS or using a Commodore 64. >>

MrHalfDime · October 13, 2012 11:07PM

It works fine for me, using Firefox. I use it often. I think your problem lies with your browser.

morgansforever · October 13, 2012 11:10PM

<<It works fine for me, using Firefox. I use it often. I think your problem lies with your browser. >>
Closed out Chrome and using IE8 now. I'm able to find threads I've responded to, but I want a list of threads I've generated.
Is it even possible?

Shamika · October 13, 2012 11:43PM

It does NOT work for me (the advanced search). I also get the same error code 100.

BAJJERFAN · October 14, 2012 12:05AM

<< <<It works fine for me, using Firefox. I use it often. I think your problem lies with your browser. >>
Closed out Chrome and using IE8 now. I'm able to find threads I've responded to, but I want a list of threads I've generated.
Is it even possible? >>

I don't think that you can do what you are trying to do. Searching by author brings up all threads to which you have posted. I don't see any way to sort those by started or responded to.

Staircoins · October 14, 2012 12:05AM

<< I'm able to find threads I've responded to, but I want a list of threads I've generated.
Is it even possible? >>

By placing your user name in the 'Author' field, you can find threads that you have either originated or posted to. I do not know of a way to restrict this list to only those threads that you initiated.

DeliaBug · October 14, 2012 1:38AM

<< No matter what I type in the fields I get, "The page you were accessing requires variables to be passed to it.
Error Code: 100".
ATS viewing the threads I've generated is simple.
How is it done with Fusetalk? Not having any luck at all. >>

I get the same error if I search with the main search button up on the top right. If I go into a forum and search with the search box on the top left, and do not choose advanced, that works, and that is the only search that I have found that works for me.

BAJJERFAN · October 14, 2012 1:55AM

<< 

<< No matter what I type in the fields I get, "The page you were accessing requires variables to be passed to it.
Error Code: 100".
ATS viewing the threads I've generated is simple.
How is it done with Fusetalk? Not having any luck at all. >>

I get the same error if I search with the main search button up on the top right. If I go into a forum and search with the search box on the top left, and do not choose advanced, that works, and that is the only search that I have found that works for me. >>

That just searches titles only AFAIK. The advanced is the same search that is frustrating so many users here. Advanced search works with FF about version 3.6 or lower. IE 9.0 is fast and works great.

mrearlygold · October 14, 2012 2:39AM

<< Only if you're running DOS or using a Commodore 64. >>

RYK · October 14, 2012 2:40AM

Heck, I cannot even find it!

MsMorrisine · October 14, 2012 3:02AM

I do not get errors, but cannot generate lists of "threads started only"

I have tried before and failed.

The advanced function search always returns all threads included those started by others but with reply posts included.

Windycity · October 14, 2012 5:23AM

I get the same message when I try search.... using Firefox. Also, can't preview posts!!

MacCrimmon · October 14, 2012 5:44AM

Alas, FuseTalk 3.0 is now little more than the wooly mammoth.....................

Is the search function even functional?

Comments

Leave a Comment