Options
I just can't pull the trigger...

Generic Saints in 63 or 64...
I could do $460--a long time ago.
I could do $870--just a few years ago
I could even do $1,550
But I just can't do $2,000
It just does not seem right!
They are beautiful. I get it for something special...or for much better dates. But I just can't jump on board for generics at these prices...
Maybe I'll regret it, and maybe I'll change my mind...but it seems like there is a lot of downside...
I could do $460--a long time ago.
I could do $870--just a few years ago
I could even do $1,550
But I just can't do $2,000
It just does not seem right!
They are beautiful. I get it for something special...or for much better dates. But I just can't jump on board for generics at these prices...
Maybe I'll regret it, and maybe I'll change my mind...but it seems like there is a lot of downside...
He who knows he has enough is rich.
0
Comments
<< <i>Wait till after the election, then decide to go after 20$ commons. >>
<< <i>Well, I'll tell you one thing. If they drop back to $460, I'll buy every one I can find. >>
That was a lot of money in June of 1992!
He who knows he has enough is rich.
it doesn't seem logical that even common $20 gold coins wouldn't fetch a significant numismatic premium over the bullion value, especially with gold being so valuable and "rare."
don't all other coin series *usa* since their minting carry a numismatic premium over their bullion value, often times significantly so? Pre-1964 specifically.
if the thread goes that far, we could easily draw up a 5-10 line/3-5 column spreadsheet showing bullion value at minting of said coins (1c, 5c, $1, $5, $20 etc) vs average numismatic value every 50
years or so to show that with the gold coins bringing the least amount of numismatic value for "common dates" series for series.
.
That $275 1oz. AGE is lookin good
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5