Options
09SVDB continues.
morgansforever
Posts: 8,469 ✭✭✭✭✭
The seller (Powerstrorker) who claimed these are his pics last week is yet again selling another 09SVDB and claims it's the same cent.
Admitted to me via Ebay that this time these are his pics (see I take photo of coin I a coin photo man), so the previous pics were infact pirated.
He just admitted they were. I wonder about people some time.
Claims this is the same coin listed now. Sorry buddy this is not the same cent, there is no question about it. Please don't tell there is a CU member bidding on this. So the seller was trying to sell the coin listed now with the pic below last week.
09SVDB
Admitted to me via Ebay that this time these are his pics (see I take photo of coin I a coin photo man), so the previous pics were infact pirated.
He just admitted they were. I wonder about people some time.
Claims this is the same coin listed now. Sorry buddy this is not the same cent, there is no question about it. Please don't tell there is a CU member bidding on this. So the seller was trying to sell the coin listed now with the pic below last week.
09SVDB
World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO
0
Comments
Two right of the nose
And a mark on "E" in cent
Member, Society of Silver Dollar Collectors.
Looking for PCGS AU58+ 1901-P, 1896-O, & 1894-O
i think the comparison is being made to the coin listed now, different coin and different images
.
<< <i>That is the same picture. Two marks lower of liberty.
Two right of the nose
And a mark on "E" in cent >>
Clearly not the same coin, if in fact the OP is trying to compare the picture he posted and the seller's. OP's photo has claims to UNC whereas the eBay listing is clearly circulated.
so the sell powerstorker is saying they are the "same coin" and the pictures "don't lie" ?
is there another listing out there with the current listing's pictures? It's a lot of pictures to steal if these are stolen, too.
he was trying to sell last week with the pic in my thread, but all in Engrish.
It's clear it's not the same coin or pic. Then he went on to say the pic in my thread was a scan, so that's why they differ.
I told him it was not a scan but a professional photograph that you didn't take. This guy has shat coming out of his ears.
This is coming from a seller who used a Heritage pic in his 1893S Morgan listing, that was nuked by me over the weekend.
I wouldn't buy any coin from this seller, especially a 09SVDB raw.
EDIT: I'm curious what will happen if his current VDB is dipped in acetone?
Any chance it will go over $1k?
09SVDB
i did report this item and stated that with the large number of counterfeits, better images should be provided.
in the end, the buyers are covered most of the time. i say most because there are situations where innocent buyers get dragged through the mud to get their money back and
ebay has an obvious interest from multiple angles.
my goals are simply to make the playing field more honest and reliable/even for all involved.
.
no chance it will go over $1k now, at least not this time.
.
link for convenience in case it pops back up
.