Options
Newp: Liberty Seated Half Dollar from the "Big Easy"
I love the tiny ANACS holders and the grading is usually very conservative.
"Clamorous for Coin"
0
Comments
I generally like coins in the tiny white ANACS holders, too.
(and the best part, for me, is that apparently many other collectors avoid them.)
Check out the Southern Gold Society
type2,CCHunter.
should upgrade. But I've likewise seen a fair number of coins in these holders that would downgrade or gennie.
<< <i>and the pedigree is? >>
I haven't a clue. I like southern issues, particularly dates close to the Civil War years. The toning and tiny ANACS holder caught my eye on this piece. Sometimes I get lucky "after the fact," regarding a coin's provenance.
Much much much better than ngc!
Very nice coin!
based on the amount of wear. PCGS has often put similar coins into XF45 holders. Where ANACS shines is in their early holders with the gold foil hologram on the reverse.
Those coins are almost always conservatively graded by today's standards.
I would question the assumption of conservative grading.
There's a lot of flatness on the leg for an au50.
If I had to wager on the grade, I'd bet on an XF rather than an AU from PCGS.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
I don't think yours is graded "very conservatively." I think it was "down-graded" due to an early cleaning and is now retoning. The cleaning was not so "market unacceptable" as to warrant a net grade, but essentially it was net-graded, IMO. The coin appears to have the wear pattern comparable to a 53 or 55.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
I have the coin in hand now and it's much more lustrous than the photo would indicate. I've found that if the Teaparty photo looks good to your eye, you'll be pleased with the coin in hand.
<< <i>JJ Teaparty offers nice collector coins.
I don't think yours is graded "very conservatively." I think it was "down-graded" due to an early cleaning and is now retoning. The cleaning was not so "market unacceptable" as to warrant a net grade, but essentially it was net-graded, IMO. The coin appears to have the wear pattern comparable to a 53 or 55. >>
I agree with your entire post