Does anyone sense that the Lakers winning isn't a big deal?
penguin
Posts: 60 ✭
I just feel like the Lakers winning isn't that big a deal... Plus, the Kings Vs. Lakers series had a bigger hype, and higher TV ratings than the NBA FINALS DID! The Eastern Conference is just to weak, and whoever is the best team in the West for 4 or 5 more years to come is going to win the finals...
Kings in 2005
Giants in 2006
49ers in 2006
NOR CAL TO THE MAX
Giants in 2006
49ers in 2006
NOR CAL TO THE MAX
0
Comments
EASTERN CONFRENCE IS JUST PATHETIC WHEN IT COMES TO THE WEST BABY!! PERIOD
The kings would of swept the nets period.
any west team would of swept the eastern confrence champs.
The lakers vs kings was the real finals....I say the nba bans the eastern confrence.....we don't need to watch that middle school ball anymore.
The Lakers winning isn't a big deal because the big deal had already been played. Kings vs. Lakers was the REAL NBA Finals in my opinion, and probably, everyone else's opinion. Nets didn't have a prayer. They were doomed before the season even started.
Everyone knew the Lakers were going to win which almost defeated the purpose of watching the series. The only games I watched were games 1 and 4. Game 4 was the best game of the series. Both teams shot and played well.
I especially liked that poster shot, facial dunk my fellow former UofA student Richard Jefferson had on Kobe. Jefferson has mad mad hops. Watch for him in the future. I wouldn't be surprised to see him win a dunk contest if the NBA still has it in years to come.
Kobe's dunk was sweet too. I think I was more impressed with the Lakers shooting though. Nice way to close out the series.
and it didnt seem like the lakers where 2 happy they jus was slapping hands.... lol
its like yeah!