take a look at this graded card.

OAKESY25

I sent these in to PSA and got minsizerq, so I sent them to BVG to see if I could get em in a holder. The nicest one was MC but I thought it might get a 8-9 mc so I figured BVG maybe a 6? not sure how they grade miscuts. Anyway it got a 2.5?? is that what you would expect?? there is no creases or paper loss at all.

LarkinCollector

Since Beckett doesn't do qualifiers, I'm guessing the centering subgrade was 1.5-2 and other attributes bumped it 0.5-1 (max you can get above the lowest subgrade).

ETA: Whether subgrades are displayed or not, I believe this is the methodology Beckett follows for BVG.

AANV

@LarkinCollector said:
Since Beckett doesn't do qualifiers, I'm guessing the centering subgrade was 1.5-2 and other attributes bumped it 0.5-1 (max you can get above the lowest subgrade).

ETA: Whether subgrades are displayed or not, I believe this is the methodology Beckett follows for BVG.

I don't think that it is possible for a card to achieve an overall grade that is greater than 1 point higher than the lowest subgrade.

Morgoth

@AANV said:

@LarkinCollector said:
Since Beckett doesn't do qualifiers, I'm guessing the centering subgrade was 1.5-2 and other attributes bumped it 0.5-1 (max you can get above the lowest subgrade).

ETA: Whether subgrades are displayed or not, I believe this is the methodology Beckett follows for BVG.

I don't think that it is possible for a card to achieve an overall grade that is greater than 1 point higher than the lowest subgrade.

You are correct!