A quick 2nd opinion on a Bench Rookie
Hey guys I'm selling a J.B. Rookie raw and just wanted a 2nd opinion on grading just to make sure I have it pegged right at a PSA 4
(print defect on name and terrible centering on back) I got a pretty good offer and just wanted a quick opinion. (PS this isn't the one that came back EOT that i discussed in another thread that one is on its way to Beckett.)


Comments
-
Can not help on grading issue but have question about what if any impact having the full h in “the” in the bio on the back has on the value of one of these versus having the version with the truncated h that looks like ‘tne”. Is there a ptemium one way or the other ?
Topps Baseball-1948, 1951 to 2017
Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007
Al0 -
Didn't even notice that! Anyone know?
0 -
@bishop said:
Can not help on grading issue but have question about what if any impact having the full h in “the” in the bio on the back has on the value of one of these versus having the version with the truncated h that looks like ‘tne”. Is there a ptemium one way or the other ?I just looked around on eBay and most copies i see have the full "h"
0 -
The half h variation is not rare and it is not identified as an error, more of a print defect within the regular population.
Is there any paper loss on the front? I don't believe there is any, but I wanted to make sure.
You were offered the price of a PSA 4 or you wanted to see if it was worth grading to equal that?
0 -
@secretstash said:
The half h variation is not rare and it is not identified as an error, more of a print defect within the regular population.Is there any paper loss on the front? I don't believe there is any, but I wanted to make sure.
You were offered the price of a PSA 4 or you wanted to see if it was worth grading to equal that?
No paper loss. yeah i was just going try and sell it for $30-40 if I could save the 10-20$ for grading and then another $20-30 on shipping It would pretty much balance out and save the 20-30+ day wait
0 -
@Matt0224 said:
@secretstash said:
The half h variation is not rare and it is not identified as an error, more of a print defect within the regular population.Is there any paper loss on the front? I don't believe there is any, but I wanted to make sure.
You were offered the price of a PSA 4 or you wanted to see if it was worth grading to equal that?
No paper loss. yeah i was just going try and sell it for $30-40 if I could save the 10-20$ for grading and then another $20-30 on shipping It would pretty much balance out and save the 20-30+ day wait
I think the eye appeal could take it a little higher than any grade it falls into. I realize the scratch out is there, but it is not on Johnny and the card is nicely centered and sharp otherwise.
0 -
Tough one to price, I just sold a gd-vg that was worn and just ok centering for $33 + ship, and it sold very quickly on eBay. If I were you i would try to get closer to the $40 mark
0 -
fwiw, this centering got a straight 8. I sold it and the buyer was able to bump it to an 8.5. So don't sell yourself short on reverse centering.

I have to add that apparently that reverse centering is common on that card so that may have factored into the grader's decision.
"I think the guy must be practicing voodoo or something. Check out his eyes. Rico's crazier than a peach orchard sow." -- Whitey Herzog, Spring Training 19731 -
with the big scuff on the front and the impression on the back next to stars and it looks like there was pencil erased on Reds in the bio but ...... with great centering. it is probably going to get an "MK" qualifier if sent to psa. it could conceivable be a 6 MK as I feel psa is a little softer when they through the qualifier on there. but that gets you back to a 4 and without the qualifier , it would probably land as a 4.
0 -
@packCollector said:
with the big scuff on the front and the impression on the back next to stars and it looks like there was pencil erased on Reds in the bio but ...... with great centering. it is probably going to get an "MK" qualifier if sent to psa. it could conceivable be a 6 MK as I feel psa is a little softer when they through the qualifier on there. but that gets you back to a 4 and without the qualifier , it would probably land as a 4.I don't think MK is possible to take a lessor grade with qualifier fwiw if PSA were to deem it marked. You have to have that no matter what.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 520.1K Coins and Currency - PCGS
- 328.6K U.S. Coin Forum
- 14.8K PCGS Set Registry Forum
- 5.2K Q & A Forum
- 41.4K World & Ancient Coins Forum
- 3K U.S. & World Currency Forum
- 96.4K Buy, Sell, & Trade - U.S. Coins
- 7.3K Buy, Sell & Trade - World & Ancient Coins
- 1.5K Buy, Sell & Trade - Currency
- 61 Random
- 246.2K Trading Cards, Autographs and Memorabilia - PSA
- 90.3K Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
- 1.7K Autographs Forum
- 16.4K PSA Set Registry Forum
- 22K Sports Talk
- 115K Buy, Sell & Trade - Cards & Memorabilia
- 663 Buy, Sell & Trade - Autographs
- 2.2K Stamps
- 1.5K Stamps Forum
- 670 Buy, Sell & Trade - Stamps
- 83 Coin Shows
- 83 General Coin Show Information and Discussion
- 11.9K Misc
- 11.9K Testing Forum
