Question about how has grading changed? PSA
Hey guys so I am a bit confused here. I found this PSA 3 Ed Konetchy on ebay in one of the newer holders. It amazes me that this card only managed a 3.... where as a card in an older holder will get a higher grade in worse condition. Have they become more strict on their grading or what? Also, how does this affect auction prices? It seems to me that this PSA 3 sold for much less where a comparable card in a PSA 5 sells for more. Thoughts on this?? These are the two examples.... Please correct me if I am missing something!
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1911-T205-Gold-Border-Ed-Konetchy-PSA-5-EX-Piedmont-back-/202091729503?epid=2157797506&hash=item2f0d9b125f:g:CgQAAOSwB4BZ78Uh&nma=true&si=ZZBhUHifkTvo3edXpGOeM78TuHk%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
Comments
Yes grading is stricter. The PSA 5 would never get a PSA 5 again if it were sent in. Pricing is all based on vcp and eye appeal and the stronger for the grade lower cards typically do go higher than another card with same grade number.
Although most suggest to buy the card not the holder, which would land you the PSA 3 over the 5, the vast amount of buyers are looking for the higher number grade and will pay more just to have the flip from PSA tell them it is a 5, vs a 2 or 3 if submitted today.
You can't grade from a scan. The 3 appears nicer, but is that paper loss on his cheek? The 5 does seem over graded,
Could it be that the PSA 3 centering on the back might have landed an OC qualifier but the submitter didn't want a qualifier so they dropped it two points from a 5 to a 3?
Eric
Erikthredd’s MJ Collection: https://www.psacard.com/psasetregistry/publishedset/395035
Erikthredd’s Nike Air Jordan Collection: https://www.psacard.com/psasetregistry/basketball/key-card-sets/nike-poster-cards-michael-jordan-1985-1992/alltimeset/408486
That statement is ridiculous. How could any card get a "bump" on a review if any card "would never get a 5 again" i think they are a bit stricter, but there are always sliders, and bump candidates
the 3 has an obvious crease on the lower left, also the reverse ink is bright and dark on the 5 and much more worn on the 3.
There are 2 spots of paper loss?? on cheek and on cap on the 3.
Also the 5's front color pops a lot more than the 3, but ultimately I think the crease did it in.