Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Can you make a camera lens recommendation and source??

keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

I have a Nikon D3100 and wondered what might be a good Macro lens?? Thanks in advance.

Al H.

Comments

  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 24, 2017 12:15PM

    The best one I've ever used is the venerable Nikkor 200mm f4. The additional length of the lens allows you to be more flexible in lighting position, which is critical.

    You can usually find them used on eBay, which is where I purchased mine.

    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,229 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The Sigma 150mm is an amazing lens. Not too big and not too small, just right in my book.

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • Options
    ldhairldhair Posts: 7,445 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like the Sigma 150 as well but the price is a bit stiff.

    Larry

  • Options
    Desert MoonDesert Moon Posts: 6,377 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 24, 2017 2:28PM

    All good camera lenses for all types of imaging cost alot and the Sigma 150 macro does get the job done for coins. It is a one time investment in getting great images from hereon. You can sometimes find them used for less but the below link is for a new one. I have had mine for a decade now and have taken 1000s of images. The cost breakdown is not that much if you plan to use one as much as I have.

    https://bhphotovideo.com/c/product/755345-USA/Sigma_106306_150mm_f_2_8_EX_DG.html

    Best, SH

    My online coin store - https://desertmoonnm.com/
  • Options
    CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I bought a used SIgma 150mm macro lens about 5 years ago and it is everything I expected it to be. I seem to remember paying about $450 for it.

    Didn't want to fork over megabucks for the Nikkor for what little I use it.

    If you decide to go the used route, make sure you can return it if it doesn't perform or has other issues.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,124 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have an Olympus, so I can't help. But I will say that there is no substitute for a good macro lens when photographing coins.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I use a (canon) 100mm macro lens

  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Depends on what you want to photograph?

    As for half dimes or full slabs shots there's different macro lens recommendations.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,778 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The 200 mm Nikon is quite long for a D3100 (APS-C sensor). If you only want one lens and want to be able to shoot images of slabs, get a 105 mm lens, as the 150 mm lens will require a very long working distance for full slab shots.

    I have a manual focus 105 mm f4 Micro-Nikkor that I use when warranted. You should be able to pick one up on eBay for about $200. Even better is the 105mm f2.8 manual focus, which will cost more, but give you a brighter image for focusing. If you don't want a manual lens, then look for a Nikon 105 mm AF-S or Sigma 105 mm AF macro lens. Both are available new from B&H Photo. There is an older Nikon 105 mm AF macro, but it will not auto-focus with your camera body.

    Here's a lens compatibility chart that Nikon publishes for the D3100.

  • Options
    ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,489 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 24, 2017 6:25PM

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    I use a (canon) 100mm macro lens

    Which Canon lens do you use? I have a Canon DSLR and have been interested in picking up a macro for it.

    I've seen a few including:

    • Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro
    • Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Fixed
    • Canon EF 100mm f/2 USM Lens
  • Options
    BStrauss3BStrauss3 Posts: 3,901 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Are you sure about those lenses? I think the ads are confusing descriptions.

    There is a IS (Image Stabilized) and non-IS version of the 100mm f2.8. I love mine. If you are only going to use it for studio macro work, you can save a few $ by buying the non-IS.

    https://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/catalog/ef-100mm-f-28l-macro-is-usm
    vs.
    https://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/catalog/ef-100mm-f-28-macro-usm

    Normally $900 vs $600, but there is a Black Friday price of $750 on the IS lens right now...

    The fixed macro lens is a 65mm:

    https://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/catalog/mp-e-65mm-f-28-1-5x-macro-photo

    I would do some reading on the limitations of this lens before buying it - it seemed to have to short a working distance and too much magnification for general coin work.

    The Sigma and Tamron around 100mm macro lenses are available for several mounts and get good reviews also.

    The best review site I know of is here https://www.dpreview.com/products/lenses and look for their lens finder too.

    -----Burton
    ANA 50+ year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")
    Author: 3rd Edition of the SampleSlabs book, https://sampleslabs.info/
  • Options
    RayboRaybo Posts: 5,355 ✭✭✭✭✭

    How much money do you have to spend Al?
    I'd go with the Sigma 150mm, I have not used it but have heard it kicks some butt!

  • Options
    OldIndianNutKaseOldIndianNutKase Posts: 2,717 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have a preferrence for a Nikon AF-S Micro Nikkor 105 mm 1:2.8 G ED. I think that a similar lens from Canon would also be very good. But I think a 200 mm lens would be too much for a typical copy stand. This lens would produce great results with your D3100. I use this lens with a Nikon D7000 camera body, but may have to defer some coin buys to get a D850.

    OINK

  • Options
    KkathylKkathyl Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Check good will you would be surprised what used cameras they have with good parts to get.

    Best place to buy !
    Bronze Associate member

  • Options
    BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,937 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I use a Canon 100mm IS f/2.8 USM and it works well for me. I can do full slab shots but only at the very top of the copy stand. I think a 200mm would be great for raw coins but slab glare keeps the useable angle of lighting a bit limited. Additional working distance may not be helpful past a certain point.

  • Options
    keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have been given an opportunity to "test" a 105 sigma. the only problems I think it may present is the auto-focus feature which is only an inconvenience --- and --- the overall length of the set-up and the distance to focus. the latter may require a new, taller copy stand so that's not a big deal. if the lens works for me it'll save a boatload of cash so spending some on a new stand won't matter much. it is a problem I'd be having anyway with a longer lens.

    thanks for everyone's help, suggestion and insight. I enjoy these photography discussions so don't stop just because I have made a decision.

  • Options
    morgansforevermorgansforever Posts: 8,510 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 26, 2017 6:51AM

    I too have a 3100 and the 105 Nikkor is great for everything except dimes. You can shoot dimes ok but a 150mm would be better. A 105mm works great for dollars, halves and quarters. No need for a AF-S lens that are in the $800 range, buy one of these for a couple hundred. You don't need AF for shooting coins, there's a dot in the view finder that lets you know when you're in focus.

    World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO
  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,778 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @keets said:
    I have been given an opportunity to "test" a 105 sigma. the only problems I think it may present is the auto-focus feature which is only an inconvenience --- and --- the overall length of the set-up and the distance to focus. the latter may require a new, taller copy stand so that's not a big deal. if the lens works for me it'll save a boatload of cash so spending some on a new stand won't matter much. it is a problem I'd be having anyway with a longer lens.

    thanks for everyone's help, suggestion and insight. I enjoy these photography discussions so don't stop just because I have made a decision.

    As for the height of the setup, I currently have a 105 mm mounted on my camera that I was using to take slab shots. I use the APS-C crop size on my D610 when doing slabs, which makes the field of view the same as a 105 mm on a D3100. The height of the camera on the copy stand is 76 cm (30").

    Don't worry about auto-focus. You can turn it off.

  • Options
    kazkaz Posts: 9,354 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have an old, manual 105mm Micro-Nikkor that cost about 125, iirc. Not enough length to image things like half dimes and 3CS and even dimes are a bit of a stretch, so I bought a set of inexpensive extension tubes. Not perfect, I guess, but OK for my purposes. This dime was shot without the use of ext. tubes. As you can see it is a pretty sharp lens. (the white glare spots bother me too, but that's another issue!)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file