Home› Buy, Sell & Trade - Cards & Memorabilia

Fake Tmac Auto!? Certified!? Huh?

T1MacT1Mac Posts: 722
in Buy, Sell & Trade - Cards & Memorabilia
Real?

This auto is said to be from topps gallery. Its Numbered and people are bidding on it but it looks absolutely nothing like tmacs autograph.
what do you guys think?
weird
holla

Comments

  • UndertakerUndertaker Posts: 5,200 ✭✭
    well mister investigator, if you take 1 minute to read the description you will see:

    2001 Topps Gallery auto of Tracy McGrady, this is an exclusive from Topps Gallery Art, numbered 162/225 and signed exclusively by artist, add $1.00 shipping

    with artist meaning the man who has drawn the card
    Taker's Mausoleum Of Cards

    Personal Collection

    image
  • VincecarderVincecarder Posts: 1,852 ✭
    That's funny...people would bid on a card autographed by an artist. It's not like it's a comic book or something, this is a card. Maybe Upper Deck CEO's should start autographing jordan cards, you can scoop up one of those too. This isn't a picaso...it's a graphic designer making a card. Can't believe they let them ruin a nice looking card by putting an auto on it. Ah well, bet you some of the people that bid on the Mcgrady think it's a TMac auto, won't they be surprised when they get a Joe Blow auto TMac card.
    CB4
  • hitechkoolaidhitechkoolaid Posts: 582
    I thought the same thing when I saw Baron Davis's auto'd card. Then after I saw it was signed by the artist, I wondered why anyone would be bidding as much as they were.
  • T1MacT1Mac Posts: 722
    yea cause i saw the same card *no sig* on ebay.
    why would it recieve that much in bids? who cares about the person who designed the card? lol
  • kinger793kinger793 Posts: 446
    PROBABLY SOMEONE WHO LIKES BOTH CARDS AND ART.
    KINGER793
  • VincecarderVincecarder Posts: 1,852 ✭
    I would value the card less than the unautographed version. It's like I grabbed a card of my favourite player and autographed and numbered it.......there should be a -25 beside the card in the price guide.
    CB4
  • thematrix31thematrix31 Posts: 1,431
    the description says 162/225 but the actual card is 169/225
    "You tell me; I hear , you teach me; I listen, you show me; I learn" -- ???

    Join My Forums/
  • donniebaseball23donniebaseball23 Posts: 927 ✭
    weird thing is both the cards he has pictured are #ed169/225 ?!?!?!
    LOOKING CURRENT CLIPPERS and 99-00 RCS

    http://donniebaseball23.tripod.com/
    Wantlist on Site
    REFS Johnscottanthony,injun01, haliguy, FatKat, autobilia,awaltz,coachvinny, raf12,thematrix31,duncangal, Kenny21, and many more
  • yanyak5yanyak5 Posts: 1,383 ✭✭✭
    The sports card industry is losing intrest...first they start off with plane jane cards(commons) the next big thing was to collect inserts and rookies..everyone liked that until autos and Gu'ed cards came out...now these cards will be losing interest before you know it...Maybe UD wanted to have artists sign their work and maybe these cards will be the next big thing...maybe? just a theory....cards are definetly not like they used to be...i mean for instance, Cards with a piece of game used seats...who really cares about that ? All collecting is about these days is money...When GU'ed cards first came out you had to pay some pretty good money just to own one of them....now you can pay like $5-10 for one...before you know it every card is going to be GU'ed and every card in a pack will be Gu'ed.....................another one of my theories that doesnt make sense.......................lol
    Looking for an 8x10 auto photo of junior celebrating his 100 HR. lmk!
Sign In or Register to comment.