Home PSA Set Registry Forum

just curious. How many of you are collecting sets from before you were born and why??

I thought of this topic when I saw the one about having your old cards and if they were still in decent shape.

I was born/hatched in 1967.

Well, I will start this one off. Back when I was in high school, (I am a youngin and I will date myself here) 1983-1986. I bought a big lot of 1960 Topps BB cards about 200 cards including the Yaz & McCovery Rookies for like $20, if I remember right. I just loved the horizontal design of the cards and still do to this day. Well, unfortunately lose cards got lost in the shuffle of moving.

Presently, I am working on (2) 1955 AA FB set's. Of course a majority of the cards are horizontal. And have recently started working on a 1949 Bowman BB set & 1953 Bowman FB set. All my sets I am trying to do in PSA-8 condition. With the exception of, one of my 1955 AA FB sets. The one I am trying to do with as many PSA-9's as possible as well. To date I am now up to having 30 of the 100 cards in the set in PSA-9's....image

What are you guys working on and why??

Rob

Comments

  • I was born in 1977 and I'm putting together a 1965 set. I have always been into older cards and remember seeing a long time ago some 65's and loved the cards right away. I think it is a great looking set with all the colors and such. I also like the assortment of HOF'ers in this set including some HOF'er rookie cards which makes the set even better. I was definitely born in the wrong years since just about any cards I buy now are WAY older than me!

    Mike
  • Anyone who's building an 1887 Allen & Ginter set is collecting a set from before they were born image
    Please visit my eBay auctions at gemint
  • Rob,

    I was born about the same time you were. My childhood "collecting" years were 1973-1978. I discovered true "collecting" in high school. I found the vintage stuff to be much more interesting and better designed than the modern offerings. Unfortunately, I left the hobby for quite a while. But I eventually found my way back. Thanks to the internet, I was able to actually build my collection without having to traipse down to some hobby shop or across the state to an occasional show to feed my vintage habit.

    My decisions on what to collect are based on a few basic criteria:

    #1: Most importantly, the set must be attractively designed. This differs from person-to-person, of course, but is probably the biggest factor in choosing a set to work on, I think. To my eye, the '72 Topps set is the most hideous I've ever seen. But to others it may be the Mona Lisa of card sets.

    #2: I prefer for the design to be consistent. The '62 Topps set is the perfect example of what I don't like. You never know what shade of "woodgrain" you're going to get. And those sets where half the cards come in mostly gray backs and the other half in mostly white backs irritate me, too. I generally like those sets, but if I were to collect one I'd have to make it an all white-back variation set.

    #3: The set size must be manageable. Or at least close to it. No 792-card sets for me.

    #4: The set should be obtainable, in a visually appealing condition, for something less than the cost of a new car. [ I won't be undertaking the '52 Topps set in PSA 8 anytime soon]

    #5: The other thing I key on is the looks of each card I add to the collection. I don't simply say if it's PSA 8 NQ it's good enough for me. I concentrate heavily on centering for my post-war cards. Anything worse than 60/40 just doesn't cut it for me.


    The current sets I'm working on are, in order of priority:
    #1: 1938 Goudey (High # subset only) in VG/EX - EX/MT
    #2: 1964 Topps (587 cards is a lot, but I'll give a shot) in NM/MT
    #3: 1957 Topps in NM (with above standard centering requirement to add difficulty)

    Other sets I'd like to get to someday:
    1934 Goudey
    1954 Topps
    1933 Tatoo Orbit
    1912 Hassan Triple Folders (T-202)

    As they say, it all comes down to what you like. Everyone's got to go with whatever "does it" for them. Of course, it's always interesting to hear where other people's "turn-ons" are.


  • KremsKrems Posts: 347 ✭✭
    For me my main collecting years were during my little league days back in the mid to late 80's. The most amount of cards I have from any year is still 1988. I got real bored with these cards and decided to collect something older. I decided to collect 1968 Topps because I already had the Ryan, Bench and Mantle. They weren't in that great of shape but I went with it and eventually started buying graded cards and upgrading. I think the only reason I chose the 1968 set was because I had three of the main cards. Also the rookies and hall of famers are nice. I like Clemente and there are at least five cards with Clemente in the set. I also like the Cardinals so with the World series cards and all of the Stars in Cardinals uniforms (Gibson, Brock, Maris, Carlton, etc.) it was a no brainer for me.
  • VarghaVargha Posts: 2,392 ✭✭
    Born - 1961. Collect - 1951. They look cool and have some great rookie cards (Mays, Mantle, Ford, Fox, etc.)
  • Born 1944 (and you guys feel old). Like the 1933 Goudey Sport Kings Set. Only have a couple. I like the variety.
    email address: alohaet@hotmail.com
  • BasiloneBasilone Posts: 2,492 ✭✭

    I was born in 1971...a great set without a doubt...but I would go insane trying to complete it in PSA8 NQ, so I decided on 1965 for many of the same reasons metalmike listed below.

    John
  • rw2winrw2win Posts: 557
    David V. - Very fine year!
    1965 Baseball
  • Born 1987 - Collecting 1968 and 1974 Topps Baseball.

    I started collecting the 1968 set because I wanted to start collecting some older cards, and I had been given a nice Mantle from my brother for my 8th birthday and is currently the PSA 8 in my set image. The 1974 baseball set was an easy choice because I grew up a Dave Winfield fan and it has a really clean and nice design. It isn't too flashy but it is not dull either. Not only that, but both sets fit into a paperboy's budget image.
  • PlayBallPlayBall Posts: 463 ✭✭✭

    I was born in 1973. While I collect that set, my main focus is on the 1940 Play Ball set. The reason is because it offers many, many HOFer's that would be out of reach if I tried to get their Tobacco or Caramel cards in mid-to-high grade. I also appreciate that time in baseball history much more than the past few generations. Hey, they aren't the flashiest cards, but I love 'em anyway.

    Bernie
    Bernie Carlen



    Currently collecting.....your guess is as good as mine.
  • Wow, we have quite a few youngin's here. And collecting serious vintage sets.

    So far I have mostly seen sets from teh 60's mentioned. Someone even listed a 40 Play Ball set if I am not mistaken.

    Bernie, what grades are you doing your play ball set in?? That one I am sure can be VERY costly.

    One vintage set that I have always loved has been the 1948/49 Leaf set. If I were given the oppurtunity to have unlimited funds, that set
    easily would be the one I would go after.

    Look forward to hearing more from all you guys.

    Rob Ruth
  • VarghaVargha Posts: 2,392 ✭✭
    If I stumble onto a fortune that would be my next set. The cards are very crude but somehow extremely compelling to me.
  • MantlefanMantlefan Posts: 1,079 ✭✭
    I only collect cards that I remember having as a kid..starting with 57 Topps BB..ending with 64 Baseball. Don't remember most of the players in the older sets; not real fond of the style of the latter sets.
    Frank

    Always looking for 1957 Topps BB in PSA 9!
  • PlayBallPlayBall Posts: 463 ✭✭✭

    Rob,

    I'm looking to finish the set in about PSA 7 average. Some better, some worse. You can see my set in the registry. I don't have the 1940 Play Ball version of the "big three" (Williams, Dimaggio, and Jackson). Since my funds are limited, and I'm working on other sets, these will be a chore, but I'm in no hurry. Also, when I started collecting these cards, I could get the commons pretty cheap ($20-$30), and the stars easily below SMR in PSA 7 form, however, several new collectors have popped up, and the cards are beginning to get pricey.

    Bernie
    Bernie Carlen



    Currently collecting.....your guess is as good as mine.
  • Born in 55 but collecting 1953 Topps in PSA 8 or trying to someday have the set completed in PSA 8 - for now will have to settle for some with lesser grades. My son and I started this project about four years ago when he started college at Texas Tech in Lubbock. We got to be good friends with a guy in Lubbock that bought out an old card shop with a very large inventory. He had over 500 1953 Topps cards - a lot of them in nm/mt condition. We bought them (took the good with the bad) at what I felt was a very fair price and started having PSA grade them. We have done very well on some of the cards and got shot down on some. Some that I felt were sure 9's made 8's - in fact no 9's yet! We have gotten about 55 8's from this group (about 200 of them graded so far) - most people that have not bought vintage such as the 50's stuff don't really have no idea how hard it is to get 8's or one of those elusive 9's!! It is really frustrating to talk to somebody that collects newer stuff and starts giving advice on how to grade cards as "THEY" really shoot mainly for 10's but will settle for those 9's when PSA screws up and can't see the positive 10 they sent in!! I had one small time dealer at a sub miniture card show in Abilene, Tx. offer to pre-grade my cards for me for a buck a card and told me I obviously didn't know what I was doing since I couldn't "hit" 9's and 10's like he does quite regularly! He had quite a collection of 1989 and newer "gems" - each to his own I guess. "David Vargha" - Just from what you collect and your insight on the vintage stuff I had you pictured as an "Old Dude" - - - - - "Alohaet" - You didn't seem like a ww2 baby - much much younger! I wonder how many of us on here are "Old Dudes"- (I was so much older then - I'm younger than that now) - That ring a bell with anybody? Oh well, Young or old collectors the vintage cards are still where its at! - - - "Old Dude" - - - Rick
    "I CAN'T COMPLAIN BUT SOMETIMES I STILL DO" - SMOKY JOE WALSH - - -
    Always looking for 53 Topps Baseball and "stuff"
  • born in 1973. i collect 1964 topps hockey, 1965 topps football and 1961 topps football.
    Check out my new web site: Monsters of the Gridiron
  • Born - 1976

    I began collecting cards that were issued prior to my birth when I decided to obtain every regular issue Topps Atlanta Braves team set from 1966 (the year they moved to Atlanta) to present. I then became very interested in set collecting after interacting with members of this board and I began collecting a mid-grade 1953 Bowman Color set. I then felt that my focus was changing to a set that I had recently obtained some cards of (1964 Topps Giants) which I also gained information about from members of this board and it is now my primary focus. After completion of this set, I may upgrade as the cards become available and as much as Gemmint allows image

    I hope in the future to complete a HOF player set that will include my favorite cards of each player in a grade that I am comfortable with.

    I decided to collect cards that were issued prior to my birth because I respect the history of the game (baseball). I don't know a lot, but I want to learn.
    "We don't own these cards, we just hold them for awhile." -- Jay of Quality Cards
  • 19541954 Posts: 2,898 ✭✭✭
    Born in 1970. Have had every set from 1958-present. Sold everyone of them in 1988 to Wayne Grove, the first and largest dealer in Texas for ($2650). What a deal. I decided to build only those sets which are impossible to find, instead of buying back every set. The 1971 topps greatest moments, 1964 Topps stand ups, 1954 Dan Dee, 1954 Wilson Weiners, 1968 Topps 3D, and 1934 Batter ups are what I concentrate on.

    Best of luck
    Looking for high grade rookie cards and unopened boxes/cases
  • aconteaconte Posts: 2,053 ✭✭✭
    Born in 1965.

    Collect 1952-55 red man tobacco cards.

    And on occassion the 64 Topps Giants.

    Am fasinated with the 50+51 bowman baseball cards. Might buy two or three some day. I like
    the 50 Phillies, and the 1951 Campanella and Snider. Vargha, if I buy the 51's should I go for 8's
    or do 7's have any solid value?

    aconte
  • VarghaVargha Posts: 2,392 ✭✭
    The prices vary. Right now the PSA 8's are pretty hot as there seem to be some new set collectors on the block. Feel free to e-mail me on any card from the set. I have pretty extensive sale price info. for the last 2+ years on PSA 7, 8 and 9.
  • NickMNickM Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭
    Born 1972.
    I don't specialize in a particular set, but I focus on vintage.

    Nick
    image
    Reap the whirlwind.

    Need to buy something for the wife or girlfriend? Check out Vintage Designer Clothing.
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    Born in 1976.

    I focus on the 1955 Bowman set. Frankly anything made after I was born is way too easy and, IMHO, not worth the grading $$$ right now to complete all the commons in the gargantuan sets.

    I picked 1955 Bowman because it offered a wide variety of players, I thought it would be somewhat affordable (Boy, was I wrong!!), I love the umpire cards -- and I really enjoy how the Color TV design fits into the zeitgeist of the late 1950's.

    A dark-bordered 1955 Bowman card with no chips in the wood-grain border, sharp centering is an absolute beauty to behold. They are so, so difficult to find as it is, and I wouldn't even begin to imagine how hard this set was to put together in top grade before Alan Rosen's Paris, TN find in the late 1980s. As much as I dislike the man, I certainly have to thank him for a fabulous find of unopened material...

    MS
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • Marc -- good to hear from you again.

    The only card set produced before I was born was Egyptian Charioteers on papyrus stock. Seriously, I'd have to collect pre-war stuff to fit this thread, but I don't. Someday, who knows?
    Dom

    If I'm buying it's PRICELESS. If I'm selling, it's WORTHLESS.

    Looking for 1984 Donruss -
    #238 Keith Hernandez PSA 10
    -----------------and
    #637 Omar Moreno PSA 9 or 10.

    *****
  • I was born in 1964.

    Right now I am collecting some smaller more managable sets I am getting to the point where I want to display my cards in my offfice (I work out of my house) in Penzonni display cases.:

    1970 Kellogg's - Huge Frosted Flake fan as a kid remmember these a lot.... Did not save any from my youth gave them away image

    1969 Topps Decals - First year I bought card on my own and just remember these funky decals that came with the cards.

    1968 Topps Game - Tons of HOF's Vaugely rember buying some of these... in 68 Topps Packs

    Recently I am starting to collect older cards Because I love the history of the game and some of the old-time players.

    1934 Goudey - Love the art work ,small set size and some great players.

    1936 Goudey - Small Set size 25 cards - Simple photo's white border Auto's on front I love the simplicity.

    1914 Polo Grounds GAme - Neat set 54 cards -Just started on this one - Have been able to pick up chockfull of the games immortals , Eddie Collins, Cobb ,Joe Wood , Home Run Baker, MAtthewson, Tris Speaker , Joe JAckson , Honus Wagner... Fairly affordable cards when you can find them!

    Jeff
    Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass... it's about learning to dance in the rain.
  • ranchranch Posts: 341
    I was born in 1983 image

    I collect mostly vintage cards from any sport that are popular and high in demand. Of coarse I don't spend much $$$ on high graded vintage cards, so I prefer raw cards in low grade like in VG or EX condition and I get them graded myself.
  • yawie99yawie99 Posts: 2,575 ✭✭✭
    i was born in '73 and am assembling the two sets listed in my signature line. i do collect modern singles, but i don't think i'd ever try to complete a graded set of cards produced during my collecting life, which dates to 1980.
    imageimageimageimageimageimage
Sign In or Register to comment.