Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

Did I damage my cards?

I have a collection of baseball cards from my childhood, mostly late 80's and early 90's. Most of them are in binders, protected in sheets. By and large, they should all be in great condition. However, I think that keeping them in sheets in binders for the past 30 years has a tendency to curve the cards some. If they are in perfect 10 condition, but slightly curved (or rounded) from being in a sheet for the past 30 years, does this damage them or grade them lower?

Comments

  • Options
    OddRodzOddRodz Posts: 645 ✭✭✭

    BIG BOTTOMMMMMM BIG BOTTOMMMM.. talk about mud flaps.. MY GIRLS GOT'EM !

  • Options
    Dand522612Dand522612 Posts: 417 ✭✭✭

    No issue with curving. A lot of vending comes out like that as well.

  • Options
    PiggsPiggs Posts: 1,934 ✭✭✭✭

    I think it's way better to have had them in binders than in screw downs so you are probably OK.

  • Options
    OddRodzOddRodz Posts: 645 ✭✭✭

    Would anyone have a pic of the late 80's or early nineties 1 inch thick plastic 'slabs' ? Those took things to an extreme.

  • Options
    craig44craig44 Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oh how I loved those one inch slabs. Only the best cards went in those.

    George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.

  • Options
    JBrulesJBrules Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You should be fine as they do not deduct for the bowing of a card.

  • Options
    OddRodzOddRodz Posts: 645 ✭✭✭

    @new again collector said:

    @OddRodz said:
    Would anyone have a pic of the late 80's or early nineties 1 inch thick plastic 'slabs' ? Those took things to an extreme.


    What, you mean like these? (ipad is for size reference)

    When I was a kid I used all my savings to snag a 1952T Mantle that today would probably grade a 7/7.5 (maybe 8). I tightened it down in one of these bad boys for safe keeping. When I came back from college, I found the card oozed out into a puddle on the floor. I collected it in a jar and sent it to PSA, which by then had come into it's own. They sent it back ungraded, saying they "only accepted items in cardsavers, not jars" . . . I think that's the origin of the cardsaver rule...

    There were worse ones I recall. The things were literally over 1 inch thick, both sides. Like those silver dollars kept in equator volcano lava flow protected old lady fruit rolls Thanksgiving dinner finds of old,

  • Options
    Arsenal83Arsenal83 Posts: 1,176 ✭✭✭

    I went so far as to waste my money to buy the black "velvet" pouches some company made for those slabs. Who else had those?

  • Options
    Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @craig44 said:
    Oh how I loved those one inch slabs. Only the best cards went in those.

    I loved them too. I had my best cards on display. Thankfully I used penny sleeves and had no damage. I sent a handful in and nailed some awesome grades. One was a 1984 Fleer Update Kirby Puckett that scored a 10.

  • Options
    ClockworkAngelClockworkAngel Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭

    @Arsenal83 said:
    I went so far as to waste my money to buy the black "velvet" pouches some company made for those slabs. Who else had those?

    I had those. We were hard core keeping them in those things (to this day,I don't know what purpose they served lol)

    I had some half inch and quarter inch screw downs, along with the inch ones. The better the card, the thicker the holder and thats the way most collectors thought back then. Little did we know that by putting our most valuable and cherished cards in those monsters we were doing the worst thing possible. I later was told to put them in a penny sleeve first, but it was too late for all the cards I had put in years earlier. I remember a beautiful Mattingly 84D (at the time it was the hottest card going) that I had in an inch case that I opened a couple years later and it was bye bye corners.

    The Clockwork Angel Collection...brought to you by Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Chase
    TheClockworkAngelCollection
  • Options
    dytch2220dytch2220 Posts: 1,681 ✭✭✭

    @OddRodz said:

    @new again collector said:

    @OddRodz said:
    Would anyone have a pic of the late 80's or early nineties 1 inch thick plastic 'slabs' ? Those took things to an extreme.


    What, you mean like these? (ipad is for size reference)

    When I was a kid I used all my savings to snag a 1952T Mantle that today would probably grade a 7/7.5 (maybe 8). I tightened it down in one of these bad boys for safe keeping. When I came back from college, I found the card oozed out into a puddle on the floor. I collected it in a jar and sent it to PSA, which by then had come into it's own. They sent it back ungraded, saying they "only accepted items in cardsavers, not jars" . . . I think that's the origin of the cardsaver rule...

    There were worse ones I recall. The things were literally over 1 inch thick, both sides. Like those silver dollars kept in equator volcano lava flow protected old lady fruit rolls Thanksgiving dinner finds of old,

    You can bring back the past for only 9.99, they still make one-inchers.

    One Incher

    The N8 Collection: PSA Registry Sets & Showcases
  • Options
    divecchiadivecchia Posts: 6,528 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Like everyone else I had those also. Fortunately I used a penny sleeve with my cards and I only tightened the screws enough to keep the card in place and not mash the corners. I pulled the cards out between 15-20 years later and they all graded no problem. If you had no penny sleeve with the card and tightened down hard on the screws your corners would be gone or worse yet the card stuck to the holder and left some card stock on the plastic when taking the holder apart.

    Donato

    Hobbyist & Collector (not an investor).
    Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set

    Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
  • Options
    travis ttravis t Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭

    Oh yeah, the black velvet pouch. Mixing cards and romantic imagery. You could put an iPhone inside one quite easily. Like having a sleeping bag at a high tech slumber party.

  • Options
    BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 8,052 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Unused 1 inch holders can be recycled as door stops.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • Options
    secretstashsecretstash Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭✭

    Prime example why you should ~~kill ~~anyone who uses these things....


  • Options
    Arsenal83Arsenal83 Posts: 1,176 ✭✭✭

    A part of me just died seeing that Jordan.

  • Options
    secretstashsecretstash Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭✭
    edited March 24, 2017 7:07AM

    @Arsenal83 said:
    A part of me just died seeing that Jordan.

    No kidding. It was a sad day when I unearthed it from the screwdown...the seller was so thinking he gave every effort to cherish that card...it was exemplified in the 2 corners that still remain being relatively nice... :'( Turned a decent score for me based on the price into just an okay one, but yes I am still torn to holder authentic or get a number (1???) or just put back in the screwdown since it is already obvious it was removed from one...would ascetically add the corners back to it, lol... Thoughts are welcome. I will more than likely sell it if it matters if I am holding or not. I wasn't planning it pre removal, but now I just will probably replace through a sale and then a buy for the pc.

  • Options
    originalisbestoriginalisbest Posts: 5,915 ✭✭✭✭

    What a bummer for that Jordan. I still like (and liked) the 1-inch screwdowns, but ONLY if also used in conjuction with an inner layer of cardboard, at least as thick or slightly thicker than the card itself, with four small holes cut for the screw posts, and a rectangle carefully cut along with diamond corners -- much the same effect as a PSA or SGC slab. My strong preference is for the card to ever so slightly float in the middle, with no undue pressure on the corners or anywhere.

    What a bummer to open that Jordan and see that result. OUCH.

  • Options
    Arsenal83Arsenal83 Posts: 1,176 ✭✭✭

    @originalisbest said:
    What a bummer for that Jordan. I still like (and liked) the 1-inch screwdowns, but ONLY if also used in conjuction with an inner layer of cardboard, at least as thick or slightly thicker than the card itself, with four small holes cut for the screw posts, and a rectangle carefully cut along with diamond corners -- much the same effect as a PSA or SGC slab. My strong preference is for the card to ever so slightly float in the middle, with no undue pressure on the corners or anywhere.

    What a bummer to open that Jordan and see that result. OUCH.

    Do you have one of these made already?

  • Options
    originalisbestoriginalisbest Posts: 5,915 ✭✭✭✭

    @Arsenal83 said:

    @originalisbest said:
    What a bummer for that Jordan. I still like (and liked) the 1-inch screwdowns, but ONLY if also used in conjuction with an inner layer of cardboard, at least as thick or slightly thicker than the card itself, with four small holes cut for the screw posts, and a rectangle carefully cut along with diamond corners -- much the same effect as a PSA or SGC slab. My strong preference is for the card to ever so slightly float in the middle, with no undue pressure on the corners or anywhere.

    What a bummer to open that Jordan and see that result. OUCH.

    Do you have one of these made already?

    Nothing fancy but somewhere I have a VG '57 Mantle in a screwdown that I made my "insert" for -- and it works well; basically the card is just loose enough in there that it can be tapped around (like a typical PSA holdered card) but with the diamond-cut corners on the cardboard insert, there's no damage to the card's corners. Only thing is it's somewhat a sloppy job I did on the diamond corners, but it works. I'd like to make a really nice effort sometime, just for fun. These days, most cards of significant value or grade-sensitive, I'd rather have properly slabbed.

    I'll try and dig it out to show a picture of it. :smile:

  • Options
    OddRodzOddRodz Posts: 645 ✭✭✭
    edited March 28, 2017 5:29AM

    @originalisbest said:

    @Arsenal83 said:

    @originalisbest said:
    What a bummer for that Jordan. I still like (and liked) the 1-inch screwdowns, but ONLY if also used in conjuction with an inner layer of cardboard, at least as thick or slightly thicker than the card itself, with four small holes cut for the screw posts, and a rectangle carefully cut along with diamond corners -- much the same effect as a PSA or SGC slab. My strong preference is for the card to ever so slightly float in the middle, with no undue pressure on the corners or anywhere.

    What a bummer to open that Jordan and see that result. OUCH.

    Do you have one of these made already?

    Nothing fancy but somewhere I have a VG '57 Mantle in a screwdown that I made my "insert" for -- and it works well; basically the card is just loose enough in there that it can be tapped around (like a typical PSA holdered card) but with the diamond-cut corners on the cardboard insert, there's no damage to the card's corners. Only thing is it's somewhat a sloppy job I did on the diamond corners, but it works. I'd like to make a really nice effort sometime, just for fun. These days, most cards of significant value or grade-sensitive, I'd rather have properly slabbed.

    I'll try and dig it out to show a picture of it. :smile:

    The conversation has proven funny hasn't it ?

    'Screw down' holders were invented to clamp the crap down outta any 'loose' card capability. Anyone doing anything to still allow a card within a 1 inch plastic protectoid slab to still slide around, would be .. whacked. :)

    There was an episode of the Simpsons (or was it Beavis and Butthead) where the Card dude actually encapsulated the actual actor, the female Super Hero, the actual flesh and blood body actor, , in 2 foot of plastic encapsulated forever saved greatness. It was the guy who uttered 'the greatest........ card...... ever'. Was that Simpson's ?

  • Options
    baseballfanbaseballfan Posts: 5,451 ✭✭✭

    wow that's a shame with the Jordan

    that sucks

    Fred

    collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.

    looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started

  • Options
    secretstashsecretstash Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭✭

    @baseballfan said:
    wow that's a shame with the Jordan

    that sucks

    No doubt. I am sending into PSA soon unless someone recommends getting a shade higher than "1" on the grade elsewhere. I was thinking labeling authentic would do it more justice for presentation. It is obvious what the issue is and I don't feel the need to highlight it with a 1 grade...thoughts are welcome.

  • Options
    lawyer05lawyer05 Posts: 2,132 ✭✭✭✭

    @secretstash said:
    Prime example why you should ~~kill ~~anyone who uses these things....


    OMG!!!!! I HAVE THOSE HOLDERS !!! lol

Sign In or Register to comment.