Home U.S. Coin Forum

Grade the Mercury Dime Pictures.

FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

Not the coins but just the picture quality. For years I have had real problems taking pictures of White Mercury Dimes with luster. I think finally the problem is taken care of. Be truthful and tell me if the pictures are PO-1, XF or MS. You should be able to click on the picture and it will get larger.

Thanks.
Ken


And a slabbed coin.


Comments

  • KellenCoinKellenCoin Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭✭

    I am by far not a coin photography expert (I'm the worst one I know :) but I think those photos are really good and show everything they need to and a little more. MS

    Fan of the Oxford Comma
    CCAC Representative of the General Public
    2021 Young Numismatist of the Year

  • CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 7, 2017 12:28PM

    Pics are ok. Lighting is off a bit.

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pics are good; better than anything I could produce.

  • OnWithTheHuntOnWithTheHunt Posts: 1,255 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Really like the pictures (and the coins). Luster, color looks excellent. I would try and get a little closer to the coins, depending on what kind of lens you're using.

    Proud recipient of the coveted "You Suck Award" (9/3/10).
  • FlatwoodsFlatwoods Posts: 4,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Those are pretty nice pics.
    Mercs are tough little coins to light well.

  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 7, 2017 9:10AM

    I'd bid on those in a heart beat.

  • Sandman70gtSandman70gt Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 7, 2017 11:20AM

    Both look great to me :)
    So now tell us what set up are you using?
    And the 17 would look great in my set! o:)

    Bst transactions with: dimeman, oih82w8, mercurydimeguy, dunerlaw, Lakesammman, 2ltdjorn, MattTheRiley, dpvilla, drddm, CommemKing, Relaxn, Yorkshireman, Cucamongacoin, jtlee321, greencopper, coin22lover, coinfolio, lindedad, spummybum, Leeroybrown, flackthat, BryceM, Surfinxhi, VanHalen, astrorat, robkool, Wingsrule, PennyGuy, al410, Ilikecolor, Southcounty, Namvet69, Commemdude, oreville, Leebone, Rob41281, clarkbar04, cactusjack55, Collectorcoins, sniocsu, coin finder

  • RollermanRollerman Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like the 2 X 2 image best, probably because they are both larger no doubt.

    "Ain't None of Them play like him (Bix Beiderbecke) Yet."
    Louis Armstrong
  • FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Sandman70gt said:
    Both look great to me :)
    So now tell us what set up are you using?
    And the 17 would look great in my set! o:)

    No special set up at all. Just use 2 lights and my Canon G9 camera. Here is one with some tone and bright luster.


  • WmwoodWmwood Posts: 102 ✭✭

    Super coins and the pics look real good to me. I guess you could have gotten all artsy and the picture might "look" better, but without seeing the coins I think you got them pretty close to how they actually are.

    You got some great luster there. I've been minimizing the pictures to 25% and that for me seems to give a better glimpse into luster when there is some to be seen.

    The 17 looks a tad fuzzier than the others, looks like the camera might have focused on one of the outer holder rings instead of the coin.

  • clarkbar04clarkbar04 Posts: 4,976 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think those are pretty good pics. Might not hurt to do a bit of cropping, just my .02.

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Little more light needed at the top of the coin, otherwise really nice.

  • coinhackcoinhack Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭✭

    Nice coins and the pictures are very good. I think you are correct that you have Mercury Dimes perfected, but I think you nailed it on those staples. :)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file