1969 Topps #382 ( Pat Corrales)

ajetfan

I noticed that there is no listing for it in the population report. I think it is the only 1969 Topps card not listed in the pop rep. I just submitted one and does this mean that mine will be the first. Anyone have any ideas regarding this. TIA!

GATOR5

That's what they say, I sent one in 2 weeks ago hopefully an 8.


Matt

PSA68

In addition to #382 Pat Corrales, 1969 Topps Baseball population report shows that #232 Dave Ricketts, #254 Joe Schultz, #258 Jackie Hernandez and #298 Dave Nicholson have not been graded by PSA as of May 29.

gaspipe26

I'll tell you if I was asked "do you have a Pat Corrales in 8 in your set " I probrably would of said yes. It comes from a fairly easier series in the 69 set. I even went to check and low and behold I dont have it! Why? Because there are none!. I wish you luck and hope you get the 8.

Bob

GATOR5

I sent in the rickets, corrales, and shultz along with the other low pop's. One of the three was a borderline 9 just not sure which.

Matt

RayBShotz

Speaking of tough cards, I sent in a really nice 69' Radatz thats a borderline 9. PSA is probably grading it as we speak. I have looked high and low for this card over the years without success and was recently able to procure this nice one from an otherwise ordinary vending run.
I have my fingers and toes crossed because I wouldnt want to tangle with the heavy hitters trying to win an auction for an 8 or 9 in this particular card.
Any other experienced comments about the Radatz from this set out there?
RayB69Topps

gaspipe26

All the cards mentioned on this thread are super tough. Let me add 2 more. Kekich and McDaniel.

69topps8

The Raditz is tough. I'm eventually going to grade mine if I can't find an 8. Mine is definitely NM/MT but will probably 7 due to PD.