Denver Nationals
kyleslie
Posts: 22 ✭
trying not to be the annoying new guy here... but i seriously can't find hardly anything about these denver 20's apart from the book saying "generic"
i know they're probably more collectable to someone in colorado.. i myself am only 45 min north of denver but let me know what you guys think grade and $ wise
thanks
[URL=http://s1250.photobucket.com/u...6_zps93q9wlq0.jpg.html][/URL]
i know they're probably more collectable to someone in colorado.. i myself am only 45 min north of denver but let me know what you guys think grade and $ wise
thanks
[URL=http://s1250.photobucket.com/u...6_zps93q9wlq0.jpg.html][/URL]
0
Comments
also, the Kelly book, "National Banks Notes" is a bible, though is always going to be a behind the curve in new discoveries, but still solid for most notes. the bank had over $1,500,000 outstanding in 1935, so not exactly a rare one. No type two notes. Having three in a row is pretty cool, but I don't think cool enough to get stratospheric.
https://currency.ha.com/itm/national-bank-notes/denver-co-20-1929-ty-1-the-denver-nb-ch-3269/a/141605-81539.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515
go to ha.com and search for the charter number, 3269
also, the Kelly book, "National Banks Notes" is a bible, though is always going to be a behind the curve in new discoveries, but still solid for most notes. the bank had over $1,500,000 outstanding in 1935, so not exactly a rare one. No type two notes. Having three in a row is pretty cool, but I don't think cool enough to get stratospheric.
https://currency.ha.com/itm/na...yView-Thumbnail-071515
thanks, i searched there, just didn't think to do just the charter number... mine are at least 55 i believe... sooooo.... looks like i over paid... haha... o-well... I'm a sucker for consecutive notes....
Also, altho the numbers are sequential, type I notes followed large size notes in that each note from the same sheet had the same serial number, the prefix number being the plate position A thru F to differentiate them. So these actually represent the E or fifth position from consecutive sheets. Consecutive notes would have been numbered something like D004735A, E004735A and F004735A (and which would have been the bottom half of the 6 position sheet FWIW). This is not uncommon and I think that often the process of cutting/separating the sheets resulted in stacks consisting of sequentially numbered notes of the same plate position. That is, separate stack of As, Bs, etc. A small point tho that probably only the most crazed NBN guys, like myself, care about.
Pretty notes but very common bank so basically type money I suspect.
Also, altho the numbers are sequential, type I notes followed large size notes in that each note from the same sheet had the same serial number, the prefix number being the plate position A thru F to differentiate them. So these actually represent the E or fifth position from consecutive sheets. Consecutive notes would have been numbered something like D004735A, E004735A and F004735A (and which would have been the bottom half of the 6 position sheet FWIW). This is not uncommon and I think that often the process of cutting/separating the sheets resulted in stacks consisting of sequentially numbered notes of the same plate position. That is, separate stack of As, Bs, etc. A small point tho that probably only the most crazed NBN guys, like myself, care about.
now that you mention it, i did know about the sheets being all the same number... it is interesting that they would stack them like this or that someone new enough to hold onto different numbers... in your opinion would they be worth more in sheet order or like this? i guess technically these aren't really even consecutive
Unless you have a full cut sheet, I really don't think that there's much of a difference, or premium, either way. Just MHO of course.
in your opinion would they be worth more in sheet order or like this? i guess technically these aren't really even consecutive
Unless you have a full cut sheet, I really don't think that there's much of a difference, or premium, either way. Just MHO of course.