It might be a glowing description, but not an accurate one. Its not near perfect centering, as they claim.
Careful, can't say anything on CU that questions PWCC in any way. I asked him what he's doing to combat shilling and dudes got out their torches and pitchforks.
Originally posted by: Darin It might be a glowing description, but not an accurate one. Its not near perfect centering, as they claim.
Careful, can't say anything on CU that questions PWCC in any way. I asked him what he's doing to combat shilling and dudes got out their torches and pitchforks.
It is a great looking card, deserving of the grade, good centering but not near perfect.
BTW- You get a complimentary torch and pitchfork when you join the official PWCC bandwagon, but I kept mine in the closet when everyone else was threatening you.
I really like PWCC, but the "HE" thing is a crock of $#@% and nothing more than a near perfect marketing scheme.
I'll agree with the others that the description does seem to exaggerate the condition of the card, but not to a degree that I think that it is lying, so I wouldn't shame them for it. Would you expect them, or anyone else, not to try to "up sell" the card just a little? It is a very nice card, and everyone's idea of what qualifies as high eye appeal is different, and "near perfect" (in terms of centering) can also be up for interpretation. Some think near perfect should be 51/49 and others 55/45 (you get the point), there is no exact definition of the term of phrase.
I do wish that they'd stick to selling cards and stop with their attempt to grade them and give the "High End" sticker. In my opinion it is doing the hobby no good.
Both of those are sweet cards and should do pretty well. The 7.5 Clemente is a really nice example. Funny thing was at the National pwcc had a preview of their auction stuff and they did not have many nice items showing, so it is nice to see they have a decent offering this month.
Comments
It might be a glowing description, but not an accurate one. Its not near perfect centering, as they claim.
Careful, can't say anything on CU that questions PWCC in any way. I asked him what he's doing to combat shilling and dudes got out their torches and pitchforks.
It might be a glowing description, but not an accurate one. Its not near perfect centering, as they claim.
Careful, can't say anything on CU that questions PWCC in any way. I asked him what he's doing to combat shilling and dudes got out their torches and pitchforks.
It is a great looking card, deserving of the grade, good centering but not near perfect.
BTW- You get a complimentary torch and pitchfork when you join the official
PWCC bandwagon, but I kept mine in the closet when everyone else was threatening
you.
I agree, the description of the PSA 8 1955 Clemente would seem like "pwcc-he". Maybe they ran out of stickers.
I'll agree with the others that the description does seem to exaggerate the condition of the card, but not to a degree that I think that it is lying, so I wouldn't shame them for it. Would you expect them, or anyone else, not to try to "up sell" the card just a little? It is a very nice card, and everyone's idea of what qualifies as high eye appeal is different, and "near perfect" (in terms of centering) can also be up for interpretation. Some think near perfect should be 51/49 and others 55/45 (you get the point), there is no exact definition of the term of phrase.
I do wish that they'd stick to selling cards and stop with their attempt to grade them and give the "High End" sticker. In my opinion it is doing the hobby no good.
LaJoie Portrait 3+, Cy Young Bare Hand 3+
Ty Cobb Bat Off 4+, ANY Red & Green Portrait
TheClockworkAngelCollection
KC