What card do you feel is under valued.... If the Buying Group is not listening!
VintagemanEd
Posts: 932 ✭✭✭
I know some don't want to tip their hand since they are hoarding a particular card and others may not want to say in fear of the Buying Group going after them and driving up the prices Lol..... But what card do you feel is just under valued. For me it's the 82 topps Ripken psa 10. They have moved some lately but the pop is still very low. Maybe because people don't like the multiple players cards? Have one that comes to mind?
0
Comments
With that in mind, I agree his true Topps RC has room to grow. Similarly Bench and other multi players. Jim rice, Molitor's/Trammell and Gary Carter, for instance. The only multi player RCs that I think are selling at the top of the market are Rose and Ryan.
Kevin
And why should not traded or update sets count. Please give at least 6 reasons.
Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007
Al
I think the multi player Topps rookie card of Bill Davis is about to take off.
Gotta 20% chance at whichever one of his rookies you go with.
But you gotta 100% chance that it will be a multiplayer card.
Poor fella.
Forgot to ask.
Do you know if he has any other veni/opc versions in addition to the '66?
Football: 1950 Bowman Otto Graham; 1963 Topps Bob Lily; & 1968 Topps Bob Griese.
Basketball: 1969 Topps Walt Frazier
Baseball: 1957 Topps Frank Robinson; already high, but still not high enough 1967 Topps Tom Seaver, & any Hall of Famer Tiffany or Glossy Rookie.
hopefully, I can buy these soon before this post turns the tide....LOL
Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007
Al
As far as modern cards go, I'd have to say 87 fleer Jordan.
I always thought the mantle rc was way undervalued.
As far as modern cards go, I'd have to say 87 fleer Jordan.
the group already hit 87 MJ....Actually there are at least two stores in which there is proof (serial #'s, mult accts, retractions etc) that show def manipulation with the 87 10's among others....
....anyways the 87 ran up into the 7k's and has since retraced back to low 5's..probably where it should be...It def shouldn't be above an '86 9. IMHO.
I think '86 (maybe '87) MJ 9s etc (not 10s currently) are and probably will always be undervalued in a sense.....its these 2 or 3 generations mantle and he also has his universal appeal on top of it....i don't think it will peak in my lifetime...But would rather have just a slow steady growth. I should probably say global appeal. Ha.
And then as the OP referenced there are the ones that we are still hoarding. I personally don't think the steroid boys are undervalued. Or at least wouldn't throw $ at them. And I kind of like and def consider the multi player cards the legit RC.
Dan, that you!!! Good thoughts! I like it!
Just because I think you post a ridiculous amount of value/investment threads, doesn't mean I don't occasionally have an opinion on the topic.
And why should not traded or update sets count. Please give at least 6 reasons.
In the case of Ripken, the trades card came out after the regular issue cards. It shouldn't be considered a rookie. On the flip side, the 86 traded bonds or Bo Jackson should be considered their RCs, not 87. The 86TT came out first.
52T is not mantle's rookie because 51B came out first. 83TT is strawberry's RC, not 84.
James
IG: goatcollectibles23
The biggest lesson I've learned in this hobby, and in life, is that if you have a strong conviction, you owe it to yourself to see it through. Don't sell yourself, or your investments, short. Unless the facts change. Then sell it all.
One of the best pitchers of all time, second to Nolan Ryan on the career strikeout list, and a great looking card with a limited print run.
Not to high jack your post but what is the "Buying Group"?
This will explain it.
Thread
Thank you for the input. We will consider all items posted.
Wife just looked at me as I laughed aloud at this one and your signature.
Not to high jack your post but what is the "Buying Group"?
This will explain it.
Thread
Thanks for that. It was an interesting read.
Kevin
-I think high end OPC rookie cards from the 60's-80's are really under valued, but OPC looks like it will never catch on
-1948 Bowman and Leaf Stan Musial RC doesn't get the respect it deserves
-Yogi Berra RC
TheClockworkAngelCollection
George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.
1923 V145-1 Paterson Howie Morenz
Then again, I'm biased.
regardless of the efforts of a "buying group" or not, several rookie cards jump out to me as cards that are undervalued/underrated:
Football: 1950 Bowman Otto Graham; 1963 Topps Bob Lily; & 1968 Topps Bob Griese.
Basketball: 1969 Topps Walt Frazier
Baseball: 1957 Topps Frank Robinson; already high, but still not high enough 1967 Topps Tom Seaver, & any Hall of Famer Tiffany or Glossy Rookie.
hopefully, I can buy these soon before this post turns the tide....LOL
Great call on the Otto Graham. What's considered his rookie card?
Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.
I also like the Star basketball 80's cards.
Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.
1983/84 Star Clyde Drexler.
1980 OPC Mark Messier.
1984 Topps Eric Dickerson.
I think the yount rookie in high grade is undervalued compared to the brett. Lower pops. I also think the 1967 carew has some room left.
Good call.
1984 Topps Eric Dickerson. Good call on this one hyperchipper09. I would love to own a PSA 10.
84 FB is so hard to find not tilted. Had a hell of a time finding my Tippett. Thanks Troy!
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
Best Player in Baseball
His lowest pop major base brand RC (and the only one that qualifies as a Basic set card)
Condition sensitive card subject to surface issues (scratches and/or print lines) and 2011 finest was notorious for choppy edges
And the best kicker... it's population is 6% of that of the 2011 Topps Update RC... and can still be had for less $$$
1993 finest refractors. They are so SP considering its 1993, they are a hobby turning point and they are amazing cards. They should be worth much more IMO.
I'm sure a certain member here would be very happy to hear that, if he'd ever part with any.
1993 finest refractors. They are so SP considering its 1993, they are a hobby turning point and they are amazing cards. They should be worth much more IMO.
I'm sure a certain member here would be very happy to hear that, if he'd ever part with any.
You rang?
My Hoard of 93 Finest Refractors and 94 Pinnacle Artist Proofs and Museums