Could PSA have graded this Ryan Rookie without a PD (Print Defect) qualifier?

divecchia · July 31, 2016 12:56AM

I have subbed enough cards to know that you can ask PSA for no qualifiers, but is it actually possible to ask for no qualifiers on a card with a very noticeable "print defect" like the card below and PSA actually complies and leaves out the PD qualifier when grading it?

I'm seriously curious on this one and I would appreciate your comments.

Thanks,

Donato

travis t · July 31, 2016 1:14AM

Submitter asks for No Qualifiers. 9(PD) becomes 7. It was graded awhile ago. Perhaps the results would be different if graded today.

ldferg · July 31, 2016 2:02AM

IMO, this would qualify for no quals if requested. A stain, maybe not.

grote15 · July 31, 2016 2:07AM

Originally posted by: travis t

Submitter asks for No Qualifiers. 9(PD) becomes 7. It was graded awhile ago. Perhaps the results would be different if graded today.

This is correct. I have submitted single cards that have come back both PSA 7 and PSA 9PD.

divecchia · July 31, 2016 6:14AM

Thanks guys, good to know. I just thought with that kind of a defect a 2 point deduction just does not seem like it's enough.

Donato

Could PSA have graded this Ryan Rookie without a PD (Print Defect) qualifier?

Comments