Problem or Problem free?

I know nothing of Large Cents
Also, does this look like N-11?

Also, does this look like N-11?


How I pay the bills:
https://imdb.com/name/nm1835107/
https://imdb.com/name/nm1835107/
0
Comments
Pretty coin
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Not savy with Newcomb numbers.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
Apart from the N-variety that I don't know w/o my books, it's a common date, so if you prefer a more natural specimen,
there are plenty around.
The die lines on the neck, and the flow lines to the left of neck and chin, are characteristic of this die marriage and are not due to cleaning or tooling.
The color is suspect. But then the entire image has too much red/blue to it so maybe in hand it is more natural. Still, likely recolored/retoned as so many large cents are.
Lance.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
Either way it is a beautiful coin.
I agree. I like the overall look.
(Nice photography too!)
peacockcoins
Thank you everyone for helping with your expertise
https://imdb.com/name/nm1835107/
Either way it is a beautiful coin.
My YouTube Channel
AU-58 details, heavily buffed obverse. Suspect left obverse field is repaired.
The lines on the neck are OBVIOUSLY raised and as you said that is one of the diagnostics for this die. That is not the buffing. The POLISHED high points form the basis of my opinion.
The coin is Not Original, cleaned, and probably artificial color. Oh, and it looks nice.