Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

This doesn't get a Qualifier??

Even though it is on the back, shouldn't there be a qualifier, OC or MC??


LINKY

Comments

  • BaltimoreYankeeBaltimoreYankee Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I believe that back should get the card an MC designation.
    Daniel
  • baseballfanbaseballfan Posts: 5,464 ✭✭✭
    I agree the back is way off
    Fred

    collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.

    looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started

  • JoeBanzaiJoeBanzai Posts: 11,976 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Graders don't seem too concerned with backs, at least in my experience. I sent in two "wrongback" cards and they came back graded as the players pictured on the front, sent them back pointing out the problem (was noted on original order that the backs were wrong) and they then refused to grade.
    2013,14 and 15 Certificate Award Winner Harmon Killebrew Master Set and Master Topps Set
  • I look at the front and see a generous 9. That's a rather old flip and the card may have been part of a bulk order where the flaw on the reverse was simply overlooked. As part of a smaller order with added scrutiny and by the enforcement of rigid standards, that card would not leave the grading room w/o some kind of acknowledgement on the flip. I'd guess "miscut".
  • IME if any portion of the next card is visible on the back, you get the MC
  • JoeBanzaiJoeBanzai Posts: 11,976 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: UncleTwoPillow
    I look at the front and see a generous 9. That's a rather old flip and the card may have been part of a bulk order where the flaw on the reverse was simply overlooked. As part of a smaller order with added scrutiny and by the enforcement of rigid standards, that card would not leave the grading room w/o some kind of acknowledgement on the flip. I'd guess "miscut".


    With all due respect, ALL cards should be looked at carefully, not just ones in smaller orders.
    2013,14 and 15 Certificate Award Winner Harmon Killebrew Master Set and Master Topps Set
  • brad31brad31 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I do not know how to post a link but there is a '55 Bowman Aaron 8 on EBay that is similar without a qualifier. Was excited when I saw an 8 on EBay until I saw the card. I am apparently much stricter on the back than is PSA. Cards like this are why I absolutely refuse to buy without a back scan sent to me if one is not posted.
  • Originally posted by: JoeBanzai

    Originally posted by: UncleTwoPillow

    I look at the front and see a generous 9. That's a rather old flip and the card may have been part of a bulk order where the flaw on the reverse was simply overlooked. As part of a smaller order with added scrutiny and by the enforcement of rigid standards, that card would not leave the grading room w/o some kind of acknowledgement on the flip. I'd guess "miscut".




    With all due respect, ALL cards should be looked at carefully, not just ones in smaller orders.




    I agree with you, but it ain't my show, bro.



    I can guarantee you this: If I owned a company responsible for the grading of 25,000,000 cards, I'd accept the fact that mistakes can be made and make the necessary effort to correct them. I'm certain that this is how PSA represents their products.
  • 19541954 Posts: 2,905 ✭✭✭
    They are extremely concerned with the back when it is my cards being graded!!!!
    Looking for high grade rookie cards and unopened boxes/cases
  • baz518baz518 Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭✭
    If they requested no Qualifiers, it shouldn't get one... but that being said, it shouldn't be a straight 9 either.
  • gemintgemint Posts: 6,116 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: baz518
    If they requested no Qualifiers, it shouldn't get one... but that being said, it shouldn't be a straight 9 either.


    If no qualifiers was requested, the card should not have been holdered. The back must be centered 90-10 or better to not be considered miscut. This card was a goof-up by PSA. There are a few exceptions to the back centering. Those would be cards with design anamolies that render all cards with print out to the border. An example would be 1959 Bill Hall where all examples I've seen have the name plate on the reverse extend out to the edge of the card.

    image
Sign In or Register to comment.