GTG 1832 CBH-Fresh from PCGS

maibockaddict · January 28, 2016 6:41AM

So what did she grade?

DennisH · January 28, 2016 6:48AM

WAG... AU55

ElmerFusterpuck · January 28, 2016 6:53AM

Looks like a 55, maybe even a 58.

coinkat · January 28, 2016 7:34AM

55 - possibly 58

grip · January 28, 2016 7:42AM

55.

Pokermandude · January 28, 2016 7:47AM

55 looks right

TopographicOceans · January 28, 2016 7:53AM

55/58

amwldcoin · January 28, 2016 8:04AM

58+!

lkeigwin · January 28, 2016 8:12AM

53/55. Nice one, Dave!

Lance.

CommemKing · January 28, 2016 8:28AM

AU58

sparky64 · January 28, 2016 8:43AM

Looks like a 55 to me so that means I should say 50/53.

Nice!

jughead1893 · January 28, 2016 9:25AM

JRocco · January 28, 2016 9:49AM

Nice coin.

If it were mine I would call her a 55 and hope they did the same.

Could see them going 53 but it looks like a solid 55.

DanielBoone · January 28, 2016 9:55AM

55. I think too much rub on the obverse for a 58 but very nice toning and luster! Definitely a keeper!

mozin · January 28, 2016 10:06AM

Nice looking PCGS 55.

golden · January 28, 2016 10:59AM

I am going to be different and say 53.

drddm · January 28, 2016 11:31AM

Depends on luster, I'd say 55, but if lacking slightly, I'd go with 53. Nice 1832!

mannie gray · January 28, 2016 4:43PM

Looks 58

BustHalfBrian · January 28, 2016 5:22PM

Originally posted by: coinkat
55 - possibly 58

ditto

maibockaddict · January 28, 2016 10:40PM

Crossed at grade from NGC at AU58

It is a terrific coin, and the toning is rather thick and ancient making the luster tough to capture properly...

will do another later

maibockaddict · January 29, 2016 4:50AM

I should add that it is an O-104

GTG 1832 CBH-Fresh from PCGS

Comments

Leave a Comment