Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1969 Seaver PSA 9 Ending Tonight ALERT - Same Flip # but Seems to Be Different Card

Something is amiss with regard to the following eBay listing:

69_SEAVER_PSA9

I checked on VCP and found the sale and image for the same flip number sold by sundiegocollectibles on 2/20/2014.

Link_to_2014_Sale

It's hard to believe this is the same card. In the purple circle where Seaver's name appears the eBay listing shows a while print eye over the "c" in pitcher that is nowhere to be seen on the 2/20/2014 image. Also, the 2/20/2014 image has two white print dots at approx 1 o'clock and 8 o'clock on the edge of the black circle around the purple circle which I don't see on the eBay listing image.

There are more differences. There is a white print spot on Seaver's left cheek and a white "scratch" under his chin in the 2/20/2014 image that also don't appear on the eBay listing.

There are only 2 possible explanations:

1) The eBay seller has a scanner that has somehow "corrected" blemishes in the image (possibly not deliberate as there are automatic settings which can sometimes do this)

2) It's not the same card

The only other yellow flag is that the same seller sold another one of these cards on 5/31/2015. However, its a reasonably low-pop card, so its unusual that one seller would have more than one so soon after the first. Not impossible, but with the differences in the card images this issue also needs to be considered.

For subscribe to VCP, here is a copy of the image from the 2/20/2014 sale.
image


And here is a capture of the eBay listing photo

image

Very Strange.


Dave

Comments

  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,735 ✭✭✭✭✭
    David, the second link only works if you have a membership with VCP.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • PaulMaulPaulMaul Posts: 4,891 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The lower right corner sure looks the same in both.
  • PaulMaulPaulMaul Posts: 4,891 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The tilt seems the same on both also. It doesn't look like a strong 9 at all, but it seems to be the same card.
  • JBrulesJBrules Posts: 2,126 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks the same to me.
  • 70ToppsFanatic70ToppsFanatic Posts: 2,106 ✭✭✭✭
    Look carefully at the Purple circle differences, the white spot on Seaver's left cheek and the white "scratch" under the chin. Compared to the ebay listing

    photo there are a lot of differences. Again, it may be a enhanced image due to a scanner but the differences are significant.


    Dave
  • PaulMaulPaulMaul Posts: 4,891 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It just doesn't seem possible that a different card could have all the structural properties these two share...specific wear at lower right corner (with dot), same tilt, same exact centering, etc. I would guess the differences you see must be scan related.
  • JBrulesJBrules Posts: 2,126 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My guess would be that the bottom image was cleaned up (someone removed spots with photoshop etc..). Unethical to enhance an image but you see it a lot.
  • mlbfan2mlbfan2 Posts: 3,115 ✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: 70ToppsFanatic

    Look carefully at the Purple circle differences, the white spot on Seaver's left cheek and the white "scratch" under the chin. Compared to the ebay listing

    photo there are a lot of differences. Again, it may be a enhanced image due to a scanner but the differences are significant.




    Those could easily be a scratch on the holder or dust on the scanner/holder. The cards have too much in common for them to be different cards, IMO.
  • 70ToppsFanatic70ToppsFanatic Posts: 2,106 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: PaulMaul
    It just doesn't seem possible that a different card could have all the structural properties these two share...specific wear at lower right corner (with dot), same tilt, same exact centering, etc. I would guess the differences you see must be scan related.


    Certainly a possibility (as previously suggested). Most of the differences relate to "white" marks in the old picture that do not appear in the new one. Could be some sort of auto-correcting by the scanner.



    Dave
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,735 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree these are the same card. The second scan actually looks a bit better to me. There is what appears to be a white scuff mark under the bill of Seaver's cap in the first pic that that I do not see in the second pic.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭
    I agree with most of the above posts. Too many similarities for it to be two different cards. I also agree it is probably scanner related. In addition, IMO, one would be crazy to pay "9" money for this card.
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • brendanb438brendanb438 Posts: 1,595 ✭✭✭
    Also agree with everyone else, that is the same exact card. Whether the scanner software cleaned it up a bit or the person did this after the fact with say Photoshop who knows.
  • Looks like the same card to me as well.
  • estangestang Posts: 1,344 ✭✭✭
    Same card -- scanning / color contrast differences...
    Enjoy your collection!
    Erik
  • ldfergldferg Posts: 6,745 ✭✭✭
    Agreed with others - same card. Scanning techniques are causing the differences you are noticing.


    Thanks,

    David (LD_Ferg)



    1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
  • Doesn't even need to be cleaned up. Looks like one was scanned on a dusty scanner. One on a clean one. Not seeing an issue here.
  • JoeBanzaiJoeBanzai Posts: 11,976 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: mlbfan2
    Originally posted by: 70ToppsFanatic
    Look carefully at the Purple circle differences, the white spot on Seaver's left cheek and the white "scratch" under the chin. Compared to the ebay listing
    photo there are a lot of differences. Again, it may be a enhanced image due to a scanner but the differences are significant.


    Those could easily be a scratch on the holder or dust on the scanner/holder. The cards have too much in common for them to be different cards, IMO.


    This.
    2013,14 and 15 Certificate Award Winner Harmon Killebrew Master Set and Master Topps Set
  • SdubSdub Posts: 736 ✭✭✭
    I've looked at both cards carefully. To the best of my knowledge, they both look like 7's.
    Collecting PSA 9's from 1970-1977. Raw 9's from 72-77. Raw 10's from '78-'83.
    Collecting Unopened from '72-'83; mostly BBCE certified boxes/cases/racks.
    Prefer to buy in bulk.
Sign In or Register to comment.