Aww geez. Again?
skrezyna23
Posts: 908 ✭✭✭
11 watchers on this inflated priace
The last few sales driving the market on this issue? Seller appears to think so.
The last few sales driving the market on this issue? Seller appears to think so.
0
Comments
Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona.
-George F. Will
Key rookie cards across the board have moved up. At the moment it is what it is.
Mattingly is still one of the top players for collectors that started in the 1980's This is his top rookie to get so I can see the money chasing it now. I think the one at 4SC sold for at least $1700+ since I don't see it anymore on their site anymore.
Instagram: mattyc_collection
Wow. I'm surprised at these prices for mid 80's anything. I don't follow Mattingly cards but I understand the supply and demand factors. Growing up in NJ and collecting in the 80's I can understand people wanting this card. Does anyone really know how many 1984 Tiffany sets were made? I believe that was the first year for those so my guess is not many. I remember they were higher quality than the regular Topps so that should yeild higher grade cards.
The print run was 10,000 sets. The main issue is that the box the set was housed in is made of a very flimsy cardboard. If anyone has opened a Tiffany set, the end cards are the ones that are most likely to be damaged. Mattingly is card #8.
The general PSA 10 % of the 1984 Tiffany is around 34%, which is higher than the regular 1984 Topps % of 28%. The Tiffany Mattingly PSA 10 % is 5.7% vs 6.2% for the Topps. However there are 512 PSA 10 Topps and only 30 Tiffanys.
I think most of the 30 reside in permanent collections (like mine). Looking back it was pretty obvious that this card was due for a run.