1968-S Lincoln Cent Struck on a Copper-Nickel Clad Dime Planchet. NGC graded Proof-65. ON HOLD
DaveWcoins
Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭
1968-S Lincoln Cent Struck on a Copper-Nickel Clad Dime Planchet. NGC graded Proof-65.
This thing is wild. Just wild. It's wild, I tells ya. How in the world could this possibly exist? I dunno, but it does. This has it all. It is in nearly perfect condition. It is struck in proof finish. It is a part of the most popularly collected series in US numismatics, and it boasts extreme rarity. Best of all, it is not crazy expensive like a lot of superstar errors are. Not even a tiny bit crazy, as a matter of fact.
ON HOLD
7 day return for any reason (or no reason at all). Postage is included.
See similar coins at: DaveWcoins.com Inventory Page
This thing is wild. Just wild. It's wild, I tells ya. How in the world could this possibly exist? I dunno, but it does. This has it all. It is in nearly perfect condition. It is struck in proof finish. It is a part of the most popularly collected series in US numismatics, and it boasts extreme rarity. Best of all, it is not crazy expensive like a lot of superstar errors are. Not even a tiny bit crazy, as a matter of fact.
ON HOLD
7 day return for any reason (or no reason at all). Postage is included.
See similar coins at: DaveWcoins.com Inventory Page
Dave Wnuck. Redbook contributor; long time PNG Member; listed on the PCGS Board of Experts. PM me with your email address to receive my e-newsletter, and visit DaveWcoins.com Find me on eBay at davewcoins
0
Comments
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
"You Suck Award" - February, 2015
Discoverer of 1919 Mercury Dime DDO - FS-101
<< <i>Best of all, it is not crazy expensive like a lot of superstar errors are. Not even a tiny bit crazy, as a matter of fact. >>
Very cool and Proof Mint Errors rarity wise rank pretty even with Gold Mint Errors
Now if this was on a 90% silver proof dime planchet it would easily jump into the 5 figure hemisphere.
<< <i>other than surface? How would one go about verifying it's a proof vs proof struck? >>
The coin has been struck twice, as expected of proofs. Why couldn't it be a double-struck circulation strike? Planchets for these display LOTS of marks that disappear during the striking process if the pieces are well struck; if the strikes are weak, you will see these surface imperfections on the high points. The planchet used to make this coin was too clean---it had to be more carefully prepared/selected, also expected of a proof. Both sides of this piece look mushy--the planchet was too thin for the setting of the spacing between the dies, and the diameter of the planchet too narrow for the collar.
I certainly believe that it's a proof error---I bought it earlier today.
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]