Corners or Centering?
mexpo75
Posts: 1,939 ✭✭✭✭
What is general consensus? On a vintage card is it better for stronger corners and poor centering(not MC) or slightly touched corner and nearly perfect centering?
PackManInNC
0
Comments
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
<< <i>I am looking at 63 Rose. I like centering but wondering if it is worth a little premium in price. >>
That's a card that will definitely go for a premium if centered.
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
All that said, cards that are well-centered seem to sell for the highest amount. That reflects demand and, correspondingly, some consensus on the answer to your question.
If a card is slightly towards the top but centered 50-50 side to side I don't mind it too much, but it would still have to be 55-45 or so.
Some cards are almost impossible to find centered, so that is an additional challenge.
Always looking for Mantle cards such as Stahl Meyer, 1954 Dan Dee, 1959 Bazooka, 1960 Post, 1952 Star Cal Decal, 1952 Tip Top Bread Labels, 1953-54 Briggs Meat, and other Topps, Bowman, and oddball Mantles.
When a card I want is very expensive, I seek out a centered, focused example that has weak corners or preferably back wear. I like a picture framed well, and not crooked.
I have also found that when viewing cards in hand, on an online gallery, or on a wall display, I can see centering and image a mile away, and not so much the corners. Thus for me centering and focus are the main determinants of eye appeal.
Personally, I love the rarity/hunt for great centering on certain cards. It makes finding a card for the collection a challenge and process, and thus fun.
As someone said above, it is all personal preference, personal aesthetics, what simply "looks right" to the collector's eye. My personal take is that all cards were "born" at the factory with sharp corners, but few were "born" with the rare attribute of great centering. To me a card was intended by the manufacturer to be handled or take a journey through time, and thus some honest corner wear is understandable and natural. Whereas the designer/maker of the card definitely intended it to be centered, and so poor centering is more, to me, a mistake at the factory that resulted in a card that is not the intended, ideal look.
Instagram: mattyc_collection
<< <i>Hmmmm good question. To be honest when I was younger centering didn't seem to matter as much as it does now - to me or the hobby as a whole. I kinda like the look of a card that looks like it just came out of a pack, even of the centering isn't perfect. I will say that registration is more important to me than either centering or corners. >>
^^ this.
And Matty, I was SHOCKED by your answer!
[URL=http://s260.photobucket.com/user/dbuck01/media/IMG_0001_1.jpg.html][/URL]
Always looking for Mantle cards such as Stahl Meyer, 1954 Dan Dee, 1959 Bazooka, 1960 Post, 1952 Star Cal Decal, 1952 Tip Top Bread Labels, 1953-54 Briggs Meat, and other Topps, Bowman, and oddball Mantles.
As for me, I will go with centering for a couple of reasons: 1) When a card is being shown in a collection, may it be on a stand on a shelf, it is harder to see the corners than the centering.
2) for resale value, the centered cards seam to carry the premium.
3) At age 62 now, I need a frigen loupe to get a good look at corners where I can still notice centering.
<< <i>And Matty, I was SHOCKED by your answer! >>
You stole my thunder. I actually thought of Matt once I saw the title of the thread.
TheClockworkAngelCollection
It's really a little bit of everything for me. I like a card that, had the condition not been compromised over the years, would have a decent shot at a PSA 9 or 10.
Then there are some cards that I can't be picky about, like the 1966 Topps USA Test Hockey set I'm working on. Low grade examples show-up on eBay at the rate of one every six to eight weeks, so I pick them up and am thrilled no matter how they look.
Since the '66 Tests rarely show up, I started working on a raw 1979 OPC Hockey set too, concentrating on centering only and eventually working my way up. For me, the process of upgrading begins with centering, so I suppose that's more important, again to me, than corners.
I can see why corners are important to collectors. Kevin Ledwith wrote in the July 2009 SMR article, The Grading Approach to Corners, "In grading a card, eye-appeal is paramount. If you have a well-centered card with soft or fuzzy corners, then the eye-appeal is greatly diminished. It is extremely important for you, the collector, to protect those corners. From the very moment a card is printed, the corners are at risk from being nicked. There are so many stages: printing, stacking, cutting, packing, boxing, shipping, displaying, purchasing, opening; and finally, putting the card into a sleeve or binder. These stages result in so many opportunities for a corner or two to get dinged."
<< <i>I am drawn to centering but certainly understand the corners. When I started collecting again (just over a year ago) I would buy the holder not the card. Below is an example of this. Bought the PSA 8 first then PSA 9 then the PSA 7. I sold the 8 because I got to the point of not being able to look at how off-centered it was. Got the 9 and like it a lot but when I stumbled on the 7 I could not resist buying it because of the centering. For me it is a tough call if I had to choose between the 9 or 7 because they both have some great qualities that stand out. Lucky for me I do not have to make that decision because I like them both. Which one do you like best? >>
I like the 7 the best, but not due to the centering. The crisp registration and bold colors are fantastic! The PD/snow in the black is a touch distracting, but even the 9 has it, though it's in a better location on that one.
Dumb question, but what is registration? Is it the printing alignment?
<< <i>Dumb question, but what is registration? Is it the printing alignment? >>
Yes, the alignment/focus and colors. It seems cards with the boldest colors that really pop are the most susceptible to PD issues (fisheyes, snow and color bleed).
<< <i>I like the PSA 7 Bench the best, but it's not because of the corners or the centering. The 8 and 9 are noticeably tilted, whereas if there's any tilt at all in the 7 it's slight enough that my eye doesn't immediately notice it. As I've said before, tilt kills me. >>
+1