Am I seeing this 86 Fleer Wax Pack correctly
RookieHOFers
Posts: 733 ✭✭✭
Does this pack have a huge split on the side? This is no longer a PSA 9 pack is it?
86 Fleer Wax Pack
86 Fleer Wax Pack
Matt
I collect: 80’s Rookies and 86 Fleer Basketball
I collect: 80’s Rookies and 86 Fleer Basketball
0
Comments
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
Doug
Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
<< <i>That's why PSA stopped grading wax packs unless the gum was fused to the card. Tim, whatever happened to the new holders? Is PSA grading all packs once again? >>
From what I can see based on recently graded packs, they have resumed grading wax packs but the holder is not different from the later one they were using prior to this without the tabs inside the holder (like the Jordan pack holder). Those newer holders were better at preventing tears from loose gum in transit, but not all the time.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
"You'd think that the seller would disclose the fact that the pack has a tear"
I'm not here to defend anyone BUT the picture is extremely clear as to what condition
the pack is in.
<< <i>"You'd think that the seller would disclose the fact that the pack has a tear"
I'm not here to defend anyone BUT the picture is extremely clear as to what condition
the pack is in. >>
That is true but such a glaring flaw ought to be mentioned in the description, too, imho.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
"Candidly shocked", huh? LOL!
OK, that's not dramatic at all. Sure glad this board isn't prone to hyperbole the way that other ones are! Thanks for a good laugh this afternoon!
<< <i>That tear is unfortunate, I agree it should probably be stated in the description even though it is obvious in the picture.
"Candidly shocked", huh? LOL!
OK, that's not dramatic at all. Sure glad this board isn't prone to hyperbole the way that other ones are! Thanks for a good laugh this afternoon! >>
Ha!