Home U.S. Coin Forum

CBH die state question.

sparky64sparky64 Posts: 7,040 ✭✭✭✭✭
I know about the interest in die marriages for serious CBH collectors but don't recall as much discussion about die states.

I've never heard anyone say that they didn't care for a coin because the stars were mushy and bleeding into the rims.

All things being equal wouldn't you rather go for the sharp stars & denticles or it doesn't really matter?

"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"

My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress

Comments

  • mozinmozin Posts: 8,755 ✭✭✭
    I would much rather own a well-struck Bustie, than a late die state example, unless their is a big difference in cost, or unless the late die state is dramatically broken.
    I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
  • jayPemjayPem Posts: 4,081 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with Mozin all the way...although there are plenty of late die state pieces I would love to find !
    My collection is very heavy on late die state coins, I like them very much, and in terms of the coins I tend to hold onto the longest, they are the most coveted.

    But I also love a super well struck CBH...particularly if it's an early date !image
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,892 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm with Mozin. And yet die states can be very fun. Lots of folks collect bust coins this way. Many bust halves have special rarity ratings for die states.

    Here's a very LDS 1814/3 I sold a while back through a Sheridan Downey auction. The cud below the 4 makes it very scarce. It sold for a nice price, largely because of its die state.
    Lance.

    imageimage

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file