1944-D Mercury Dime GTG (Grade Posted)

Kyle · February 12, 2015 7:10AM

Nothing special, but it's a NEWP.

I need to learn a better lighting technique for small (and lustrous) silver coins.

I'll post the grade later tonight.

Unknown · February 12, 2015 7:21AM

This content has been removed.

PTVETTER · February 12, 2015 7:22AM

I am in the 65FB camp

Nice dime

BryceM · February 12, 2015 7:23AM

Today's grade = MS65+FB or MS666FB.

Rattler grade = MS65FB

Unknown · February 12, 2015 7:28AM

This content has been removed.

keyman64 · February 12, 2015 7:32AM

By today's standards, 66. Not sure if it meets FB but I am guessing it does.

cucamongacoin · February 12, 2015 7:34AM

66, and I think it gets the FB nod

DIMEMAN · February 12, 2015 7:38AM

65 or 66......no bands.....no matter what the label says.

Wabbit2313 · February 12, 2015 7:56AM

66 no FB.

morgandollar1878 · February 12, 2015 8:32AM

looks like a 66+ or 67. No FB

remumc · February 12, 2015 9:37AM

65, not FB

lasvegasteddy · February 12, 2015 9:40AM

66 no fb

sweet mercury dime there regardless for being a nothing special

Kyle · February 12, 2015 10:16AM

Unknown · February 12, 2015 10:17AM

This content has been removed.

DIMEMAN · February 12, 2015 10:38AM

Nice common dime graded correctly.......but NOT FB.

CoinJunkie · February 12, 2015 10:40AM

<< <i>Nice common dime graded correctly.......but NOT FB. >>

Hard to tell for sure, but it appears there is some scuffing on the slab over the center of the middle band.

Wabbit2313 · February 12, 2015 10:41AM

Gold sticker, Sweet!

BryceM · February 12, 2015 10:48AM

<< <i>Today's grade = MS65+FB or MS666FB.

Rattler grade = MS65FB >>

It's really nice to be right on a GTG thread. I'd open a stickering agency, but apparently I already have an issue with mechanical errors.........

C0INB0Y · February 12, 2015 2:04PM

Sin-full, if that is NOT FB!

What the heck, guys! Teach me!

Why not?

Thanks in advance!

1944-D Mercury Dime GTG (Grade Posted)

Comments

Leave a Comment