Any list that has both Stargell and Brett in the top five, and ahead of Mike Schmidt can't be all bad.
I guess I missed this thread when it was first posted.
But maybe Rose gained a little too much on your revised list just because of longevity?
On the revised list, Gene Tenace did plummet to where he belongs, from a score of 170 to 106.
Dallas- why didn't you put a comment after his name?
Gene Tenace- 106 Wow, he sucked a lot worse than I thought.
@Darin said:
But maybe Rose gained a little too much on your revised list just because of longevity?
On the revised list, Gene Tenace did plummet to where he belongs, from a score of 170 to 106.
Dallas- why didn't you put a comment after his name?
Seriously, you're going to make both of these comments in a single post. But to answer your question, yes, Rose gained a lot because he played forever, and Tenace dropped a lot because he didn't play very long. I didn't put a comment because everyone understood that so it wasn't interesting.
But yeah, I really enjoyed this thread. I think there are flaws with both the original and revised lists but between the two of them they paint an awfully good picture.
This is for you @thisistheshow - Jim Rice was actually a pretty good player.
Comments
Buckner sucked at fielding grounders too
Any list that has both Stargell and Brett in the top five, and ahead of Mike Schmidt can't be all bad.
I guess I missed this thread when it was first posted.
But maybe Rose gained a little too much on your revised list just because of longevity?
On the revised list, Gene Tenace did plummet to where he belongs, from a score of 170 to 106.
Dallas- why didn't you put a comment after his name?
Gene Tenace- 106 Wow, he sucked a lot worse than I thought.
Seriously, you're going to make both of these comments in a single post. But to answer your question, yes, Rose gained a lot because he played forever, and Tenace dropped a lot because he didn't play very long. I didn't put a comment because everyone understood that so it wasn't interesting.
But yeah, I really enjoyed this thread. I think there are flaws with both the original and revised lists but between the two of them they paint an awfully good picture.