Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1986 Topps Baseball: Would you sub these? -- Update

Hey Guys, looking for opinions on whether these are sub worthy. I'm thinking that they should appear at least a 9 if I'm going to sub. I've only pulled the stars that weren't poorly off center...haven't paid attention to the commons. Also through in a few others for opinions.
EDIT: Removed prior images
UPDATE: Thanks for the feedback guys. I trimmed the selection of 1986 cards down to 6 and tried to get a better scan. Opinions on these 6? (the dot on the top left corner of Mattingly is on the case)
image

Comments

  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Hey Guys, looking for opinions on whether these are sub worthy. I'm thinking that they should appear at least a 9 if I'm going to sub. I've only pulled the stars that weren't poorly off center...haven't paid attention to the commons. Also through in a few others for opinions. >>


    It's a lot of cards to give an opinion on so I'll stick with a few general points and point out a few cards it applies to on the 86s.

    - White showing on black borders/corners - Guillen, both Dykstras, Gwynn, Yount
    - T/B centering too far off for 9 - Davis, Boggs - almost all of these are centered at least a bit high, Sandberg and Ripken actually display about the best T/B centering of the 86s
    - corners - these may be just the pics, but Fielder (upper right), Murray (upper left), Sandberg (lower left), Gooden (upper right) and others don't appear sharp enough for a chance at 9

    Most of the R/L centering on these appear to fall within 9 standards, with the Gooden and Schmidt jumping out as exceptions. I would recommend a 2nd pass to weed out the above issues and scans rather than pics on the next round. Hope this helps!
  • sandberg 86 brings good money in a 10 but they're tough. that one looks decent however depending on surface which is typically the demise for those
    It never leaves you...
  • DavisDavis Posts: 705 ✭✭
    Thanks the help guys. I know the pics aren't the best...just using my iPhone.
  • StingrayStingray Posts: 8,843 ✭✭✭
    i would not grade any of the 86s that are not perfectly centered or any that look like they have any white on the top two corners.
  • DavisDavis Posts: 705 ✭✭


    << <i>i would not grade any of the 86s that are not perfectly centered or any that look like they have any white on the top two corners. >>


    Gotcha. I'll make a round of cuts and post bigger pics of those that make the 2nd round. Any of them jump out at you (good or bad)? I appreciate it...I'm pretty novice when it comes to baseball grading...seems like the OPC hockey I submit is way more lenient.
  • DialjDialj Posts: 1,636 ✭✭
    I would only consider submitting the football cards.
    "A full mind is an empty bat." Ty Cobb

    Currently collecting 1934 Butterfinger, 1969 Nabisco, 1991 Topps Desert Shield (in PSA 9 or 10), and 1990 Donruss Learning Series (in PSA 10).
  • Mick65Mick65 Posts: 722 ✭✭✭

    Side topic: Did they air brush Ken Stabler's right hand? Something doesn't look right, or maybe it just looks odd to me.
  • DavisDavis Posts: 705 ✭✭
    Bump...made a round of cuts. 6 remain. Happy to get your opinions if it's worth the time/effort.
  • LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sandberg, definitely yes. Rose 1B-MGR, definitely no (too OC R/L). Others all appear within 9 qualifications, and hopefully you get lucky and catch a couple 10s.
Sign In or Register to comment.