Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Resurrecting another CBH from my collection - 1821 CBH******GRADE REVEALED*****

drddmdrddm Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭✭✭
SCROLL DOWN FOR THE GRADE...............

I haven't posted anything for almost the last 3 years due to my absence from the boards and coin collecting as a whole, so I decided to resurrect some of my CBH's.

Here's an 1821 O-103, again with an old cert #, so feel free to GTG....and for those who can look it up on CoinFacts or some other way, PLEASE don't ruin it for the others...ENJOY!!


image

Comments

  • Options
    coindeucecoindeuce Posts: 13,515 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 1823 you have posted in the test forum is radioactive !

    "Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
    http://www.american-legacy-coins.com

  • Options
    BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,199 ✭✭✭✭
    Super coin, Dave. I'll say AU58.
  • Options
    drddmdrddm Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks Coindeuce, I'm saving the 1823 for another day image
  • Options
    jayPemjayPem Posts: 4,097 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm gonna go 63 again. There could be some friction there, but somehow I doubt it image
    The true views I've had done of cbh seem to mute the luster some, I'll bet there is plenty of it on this baby, and way too appealing for 62...
  • Options
    GoldbullyGoldbully Posts: 18,508 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Your 1821 is as "pretty as a picture."

    Simply stunning coin, David.

    Love your taste in the rarer 182x CBH's.....it's great to see you back and posting high quality Bustie's.

    My grade guess.............MS62
  • Options
    BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,525 ✭✭✭✭✭
    stunning. Technically a 58, market a 62?
  • Options
    scubafuelscubafuel Posts: 2,073 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm in the 62 camp, but I'd like to know what year it was certified. That would help me decide. I feel like there's definitely been some changes in what PCGS looks for in bust halves.
  • Options
    drddmdrddm Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for the kind words everyone. This CBH was last certified in either late 2011 or early 2012.
  • Options
    AnkurJAnkurJ Posts: 11,375 ✭✭✭✭
    Very nice! I've been looking for an example for my set with nice toning. They aren't easy to come by.
    All coins kept in bank vaults.
    PCGS Registries
    Box of 20
    SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
  • Options
    BigMooseBigMoose Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭
    Beautiful Bust Half, looks 63. Sorry I messed up your other thread.
    TomT-1794

    Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org
  • Options
    drddmdrddm Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lol, Thanks BigMoose. No sweat. It's all good and just having some fun! image
  • Options
    TahoeDaleTahoeDale Posts: 1,785 ✭✭✭
    This 1821 is a 63 all the way-very nice toning, no marks, and overall as original as they get
    TahoeDale
  • Options
    valente151valente151 Posts: 1,112 ✭✭✭
    They say you narrow it to two grades within the first 3 seconds of looking at a coin. I was between a 63 and a 64. End of the day, I want to see a touch more luster from a 64 CBH. I say 63, and a nice one at that.
  • Options
    I don't like these truviews for guessing grades at all but I say 58 with my dart toss
    You may call me Dave
    BHNC member # 184!

    http://www.busthalfaddict.com
  • Options
    CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Another great bustie! I'll award this one an MS63 grade. Hopefully PCGS got it right, too. image
  • Options
    mozinmozin Posts: 8,755 ✭✭✭
    Beautiful PCGS 63.
    I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
  • Options
    Being that I am a newer member I have not seen any of your coins. I think this coin is beautiful and I would ask that you keep sharing as you have some very nice coins. I need to see moreimage
  • Options
    drddmdrddm Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Will post the grade tonight along with another favorite CBH from my collection for you to GTG.
  • Options
    pmacpmac Posts: 3,189 ✭✭✭
    Glad it survived the late 1800s when a good polishing was in order. Great coin.
    Paul
  • Options
    jdillanejdillane Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭
    So nice and sooooo tough to grade from images. I think she's MS. The crust might blunt the bloom. My first blush was 64 but I'm gonna guess she's in a 63 and compares quite favorably to most 64's.
  • Options
    mozinmozin Posts: 8,755 ✭✭✭
    I forgot drddrm had included such nice MS examples in his Registry sets. I miss seeing his Registry sets, but then, if he dhoed them again, I may well lose some rankings. image
    I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
  • Options
    drddmdrddm Posts: 5,455 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks again for the compliments everyone.

    A little background first on this particular 1821.....I bought it from Dave Kahn who informed me that it belonged to Dick Graham, who I learned has an eye for originality and superior quality when selecting CBH's for his collection, which this coin no doubt has in my opinion.

    It was originally graded MS63 and I couldn't help but compare it to many other 63's that I studied and felt it had enough at a shot of getting into a 64 holder, so I submitted it for regrade and it came back 63+, which I was happy with.

    And thanks for the compliment Mozin, however, it is YOUR CBH Registry set that should be praised for its incredible CBH's image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file