Home U.S. Coin Forum

Assistance Sought! California Fractional

telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,947 ✭✭✭✭✭
Interesting piece that I'm trying to research but can't find our copy of Breen-Gillio. Looks like it could be a third period issue as it is non denominated.

Gold, weighs around .3 gram. 11mm flat to flat.

Indian Head, octagonal.

image


Note recut stars and letters in die, also two major diebreaks- one from 11:00 rim to numeral 5 in date, other crossing from right upper wreath down to lower part of 8.

image

Any input appreciated. Can't find anything online thus far. Thanks

RIP Mom- 1932-2012

Comments

  • WeissWeiss Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,883 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Apmex says it is made by the US Mint but it was not.

    Collectible token in circulated grade or so it seems.

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,947 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Apmex has one that's pretty close >>



    I noticed that one-very close indeed, but they've already sold it and the person with whom I spoke didn't seem to know much about it.

    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
  • EagleEyeEagleEye Posts: 7,677 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If it doesn't have a denomination, it is a fantasy charm.
    Rick Snow, Eagle Eye Rare Coins, Inc.Check out my new web site:
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,705 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's a token since there is no denomination. Hence, it won't be listed in the Breen-Gillio reference book.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,947 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Kroll piece perhaps? My understanding is that some of them are backdated and not denominated. Or jeweler made? I understand several French jewelers in Cal. copied these. Any thoughts?

    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
  • Sorry can't help but to say the reverse is different than the APMEX one. I like the reverse of yours better with the stars on the outside and the die cracks are interesting. Need some more info from the Cal Gold guys.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,620 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Look here:

    linky
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,947 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Appreciate the link Tom...I sent him an email earlier with these pics attached to see what he thinks.

    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 34,967 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Apmex? On "tribute" cal gold tokens?

    Bad place to seek advice for such a tough, specialized area.


    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,947 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Apmex? On "tribute" cal gold tokens?

    Bad place to seek advice for such a tough, specialized area. >>



    I merely called them to find out what if anything they knew about the listed piece. I didn't expect them to be experts in Cal Gold.

    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
  • jcpingjcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    Unfortunately, this is not a period one nor a period two california fractional gold coin. This is just a gold charm.
    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • EastonCollectionEastonCollection Posts: 1,503 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This is not recognized as a period 1 nor period 2 California small demonimation coin therefore and not listed in the BG book. Most calfrac collectors would refer to this piece as a token or charm.

    I have seen some of these as bass and others as gold - if gold, then worth around $200 and if bass then $25-50 or so. I like this piece as it has some nice die cracks on the reverse and its made from California gold (if gold). Also, the other is pretty cool looking though not recognized as a period 1 or 2.
    Easton Collection
  • telephoto1telephoto1 Posts: 4,947 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for all the replies.
    Just got an email reply from Mike Locke.
    As we suspected it's one of the so called 'third period' gold tokens. Made by Herman Brand circa 1890. He catalogs it as Wreath3 Oct 1/2 1857 Indian #8.

    Thanks again to everyone who responded.

    RIP Mom- 1932-2012
  • WoodenJeffersonWoodenJefferson Posts: 6,491 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Thanks for all the replies.
    Just got an email reply from Mike Locke.
    As we suspected it's one of the so called 'third period' gold tokens. Made by Herman Brand circa 1890. He catalogs it as Wreath3 Oct 1/2 1857 Indian #8.

    Thanks again to everyone who responded. >>



    Still, way better than one stamped out for the tourists trade in 1954.
    Chat Board Lingo

    "Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
  • thebeavthebeav Posts: 3,870 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It would be listed in the 'Small California & Territorial Gold Coins' book by R H Burnie in 1955.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,620 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Thanks for all the replies.
    Just got an email reply from Mike Locke.
    As we suspected it's one of the so called 'third period' gold tokens. Made by Herman Brand circa 1890. He catalogs it as Wreath3 Oct 1/2 1857 Indian #8.

    Thanks again to everyone who responded. >>



    You are welcome. Mike is the pro from Dover!
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file